• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不结扎中结肠血管行横结肠癌根治术的肿瘤安全性。

Oncologic safety of transverse colon cancer surgery without central vessel ligation of middle colic artery.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital and College of Medicine, 282 Munwharo Junggu, Daejeon, 35015, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6037-6045. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11159-1. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11159-1
PMID:39134716
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical standardization for transverse colon cancers (TCC) has not been established, and the oncologic benefit of central vessel ligation (CVL) are still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic safety of TCC surgery without CVL of the middle colic artery (MCA).

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational, comparative study. The clinical, surgical, and pathological characteristics of the patients who underwent radical surgery for non-metastatic TCC between January 2012 and December 2020 were investigated, and the characteristic and oncologic outcomes of No CVL and CVL groups were compared.

RESULTS

The number of No CVL and CVL groups was 47 (44.3%) and 59 (55.7%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in surgical complications, stage, mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (LN) (24.12 vs. 22.36 p = 0.464), mean number of metastatic LN (1.53 vs. 0.74, p = 0.163), mean proximal margin (19.2 cm vs. 16.7 cm, p = 0.139), mean distal margin (9.6 cm vs. 9.9 cm, p = 0.753), adjuvant chemotherapy, total recurrence rate (6.4 vs. 11.9%, p = 0.507), lymphatic recurrence rate (0.0% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.253), and local recurrence rate (2.1 vs. 1.7%, p = 0.984). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in stage II (DFS: 94.4 vs. 91.3%, p = 0.685, OS: 94.1 vs. 95.5%, p = 0.838) and stage III (DFS: 88.5 vs. 68.4%, p = 0.253, OS: 100.0% vs. 79.7, p = 0.328).

CONCLUSION

TCC surgery without CVL of the MCA showed comparable surgical and oncologic outcomes compared to surgery with CVL. Therefore, preservation of a branch of the MCA may be considered a safe option, when combined with adequate lymph node dissection, if necessary. A large, prospective, and controlled study will be necessary to provide solid evidence of the oncologic safety of this procedure.

摘要

背景

横结肠癌(TCC)的手术标准化尚未建立,中央血管结扎(CVL)的肿瘤获益仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估不结扎中结肠动脉(MCA)的 TCC 手术的肿瘤安全性。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性、观察性、对照研究。调查了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受非转移性 TCC 根治性手术的患者的临床、手术和病理特征,并比较了无 CVL 组和 CVL 组的特征和肿瘤学结果。

结果

无 CVL 组和 CVL 组的数量分别为 47 例(44.3%)和 59 例(55.7%)。两组在手术并发症、分期、平均淋巴结检出数(24.12 比 22.36,p=0.464)、平均转移淋巴结数(1.53 比 0.74,p=0.163)、平均近端切缘(19.2cm 比 16.7cm,p=0.139)、平均远端切缘(9.6cm 比 9.9cm,p=0.753)、辅助化疗、总复发率(6.4%比 11.9%,p=0.507)、淋巴复发率(0.0%比 5.1%,p=0.253)和局部复发率(2.1%比 1.7%,p=0.984)方面均无统计学差异。此外,在 II 期(DFS:94.4%比 91.3%,p=0.685,OS:94.1%比 95.5%,p=0.838)和 III 期(DFS:88.5%比 68.4%,p=0.253,OS:100.0%比 79.7%,p=0.328),两组的 5 年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)均无统计学差异。

结论

不结扎 MCA 的 TCC 手术与 CVL 手术相比,具有相似的手术和肿瘤学结果。因此,如果需要,保留 MCA 的分支可能是一种安全的选择,同时要结合充分的淋巴结清扫。需要进行大规模、前瞻性、对照研究,以提供该手术肿瘤安全性的可靠证据。

相似文献

1
Oncologic safety of transverse colon cancer surgery without central vessel ligation of middle colic artery.不结扎中结肠血管行横结肠癌根治术的肿瘤安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6037-6045. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11159-1. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Minimally Invasive Colon Surgery for Colon Cancer: Long-Term Oncologic Results from a 10-Year Follow-Up Study.微创结肠癌手术:一项10年随访研究的长期肿瘤学结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):e1378. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001378.
3
Assessment of the Level of Middle Colic Artery Ligation Influence on Survival in Right-Sided Colon Cancer.
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2025 Jul 5;46(2):39-48. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2025-0012. Print 2025 Jun 1.
4
Patterns of lymph node metastasis and long-term outcomes of splenic flexure colon cancer: a descriptive study from a Japanese high-volume center.脾曲结肠癌的淋巴结转移模式及长期预后:来自日本一家高容量中心的描述性研究
Surg Today. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-02999-y.
5
Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Treatment of Transverse Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术与开放结肠切除术治疗横结肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Oct;27(10):1038-1050. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0031. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌:是否有必要行 D3 淋巴结清扫?
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/codi.16815. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
7
Complete mesocolic excision an assessment of feasibility and outcome.完整结肠系膜切除术:可行性与结果评估
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
8
Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗横结肠癌:短期和长期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 May;41:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
Advanced Preoperative Clinical Stage Is Associated With More Lymph Node Harvest in Patients With Right Colon Cancer.术前临床分期较晚与右半结肠癌患者淋巴结清扫数目增加相关。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):432-438. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001301.
10
The Value of Infrapyloric Lymph Nodes Dissection in Right Hemicolectomy for Hepatic Flexure Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis Based on Propensity Score Matching.幽门下淋巴结清扫在肝曲结肠癌右半结肠切除术中的价值:基于倾向评分匹配的多中心分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Mar 1;68(3):338-350. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003356. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical and oncological outcomes in transverse colon carcinoma: does tumor sublocation make a difference?横结肠癌的手术及肿瘤学结局:肿瘤亚部位有影响吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 May 9;410(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03665-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term oncologic outcome of D3 lymph node dissection for clinical stage 2/3 right-sided colon cancer.临床 2/3 期右半结肠癌行 D3 淋巴结清扫的长期肿瘤学结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 15;38(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04310-2.
2
Pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?D2 右半结肠癌根治术后复发模式和生存分析:常规扩大淋巴结清扫是否有必要?
Updates Surg. 2022 Aug;74(4):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01317-2. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
The oncologic safety of left colectomy with modified complete mesocolic excision for distal transverse colon cancer: Comparison with descending colon cancer.
左半结肠切除术联合改良全结肠系膜切除术治疗远端横结肠癌的肿瘤学安全性:与降结肠癌的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;47(11):2857-2864. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.048. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
4
Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on upstaging and short-term survival in clinical stage I right-sided colon cancer.D3 淋巴结清扫对临床 I 期右半结肠癌分期和短期生存的影响。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Oct;44(10):1278-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
5
D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis.D3 淋巴结清扫术增强右半结肠癌患者的肿瘤清除效果:荟萃分析结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1541-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
6
Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中完整结肠系膜切除术与 D2 淋巴结清扫术的短期疗效比较(RELARC):一项随机、对照、III 期优效性临床试验
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):391-401. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30685-9. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
7
Segmental versus extended colectomy for tumours of the transverse colon: a systematic review and meta-analysis.横结肠癌的节段性结肠切除术与扩大性结肠切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;23(3):625-634. doi: 10.1111/codi.15403. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
8
Optimal extent of central lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancers: is lymphadenectomy beyond the superior mesenteric vein meaningful?右半结肠癌中央淋巴结清扫的最佳范围:肠系膜上静脉以上的淋巴结清扫有意义吗?
Surg Today. 2021 Feb;51(2):268-275. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02084-6. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing D2 versus D3 lymph node dissection for colonic cancer (COLD trial).多中心随机临床试验比较结肠癌 D2 与 D3 淋巴结清扫术的短期结果(COLD 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):499-508. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11387. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.日本结直肠癌学会(JSCCR)2019 年结直肠癌治疗指南。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):1-42. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z. Epub 2019 Jun 15.