Derksen Maarten, Meirmans Stephanie, Brenninkmeijer Jonna, Pols Jeannette, de Boer Annemarijn, van Eyghen Hans, Gayet Surya, Groenwold Rolf, Hernaus Dennis, Huijnen Pim, Jonker Nienke, de Kleijn Renske, Kroll Charlotte F, Krypotos Angelos-Miltiadis, van der Laan Nynke, Luijken Kim, Meijer Ewout, Pear Rachel S A, Peels Rik, Peeters Robin, Rulkens Charlotte C S, Scholz Christin, Smit Nienke, Stapel Rombert, de Winter Joost
Theory & History of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Account Res. 2024 Aug 13:1-19. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2383349.
Drawing on our experiences conducting replications we describe the lessons we learned about replication studies and formulate recommendations for researchers, policy makers, and funders about the role of replication in science and how it should be supported and funded. We first identify a variety of benefits of doing replication studies. Next, we argue that it is often necessary to improve aspects of the original study, even if that means deviating from the original protocol. Thirdly, we argue that replication studies highlight the importance of and need for more transparency of the research process, but also make clear how difficult that is. Fourthly, we underline that it is worth trying out replication in the humanities. We finish by formulating recommendations regarding reproduction and replication research, aimed specifically at funders, editors and publishers, and universities and other research institutes.
借鉴我们进行重复研究的经验,我们阐述了从重复研究中学到的经验教训,并就重复研究在科学中的作用以及应如何支持和资助重复研究,向研究人员、政策制定者和资助者提出了建议。我们首先确定进行重复研究的各种益处。其次,我们认为,即使这意味着偏离原始方案,通常也有必要改进原始研究的各个方面。第三,我们认为重复研究凸显了研究过程提高透明度的重要性和必要性,但同时也表明这有多困难。第四,我们强调在人文学科尝试进行重复研究是值得的。最后,我们针对复制和重复研究提出建议,这些建议特别针对资助者、编辑和出版商以及大学和其他研究机构。