Miclau Theodore A, Pascual Lisa, Ndoja Silvio, Frazer Abigail, Beaupre Lauren, Schemitsch Emil H
School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
OTA Int. 2024 Aug 2;7(5 Suppl):e311. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000311. eCollection 2024 Jul.
As North America is largely industrialized with a variety of available private transportation options, trauma is a common occurrence, resulting in significant burdens of disability and costs to the health care system. To meet increasing trauma care needs, there is a robust organization of trauma and rehabilitation systems, particularly within the United States and Canada. The American and Canadian health care systems share multiple similarities, including well-equipped Level I trauma centers, specialized inpatient rehabilitation units for polytrauma patients, and thorough evaluations for recovery and post-discharge placement. However, they also have several key differences. In Canada, the criteria for admission to inpatient rehabilitation vary by location, and inpatient rehabilitation is universally accessible, whereas outpatient rehabilitation services are generally not covered by insurance. In the United States, these admission criteria for post-acute inpatient rehabilitation are standardized, and both inpatient and outpatient services are covered by private and government-funded insurance with varying durations. Overall, both health care systems face challenges in post-acute rehabilitation, including benefit limitations and limited provider access in rural areas, and must continue to evolve to meet the rehabilitation needs of injured patients as they reintegrate into their communities.
由于北美地区高度工业化,拥有各种可用的私人交通选择,创伤事件屡见不鲜,给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的残疾负担和成本。为满足日益增长的创伤护理需求,尤其是在美国和加拿大,建立了完善的创伤和康复系统组织。美国和加拿大的医疗保健系统有多个相似之处,包括配备完善的一级创伤中心、针对多发伤患者的专门住院康复单元,以及对康复和出院后安置的全面评估。然而,它们也存在一些关键差异。在加拿大,住院康复的入院标准因地区而异,住院康复普遍可及,而门诊康复服务通常不在保险范围内。在美国,急性后期住院康复的这些入院标准是标准化的,住院和门诊服务均由私人和政府资助的保险覆盖,但覆盖时长各不相同。总体而言,两个医疗保健系统在急性后期康复方面都面临挑战,包括福利限制和农村地区医疗服务提供者有限,并且必须不断发展以满足受伤患者重新融入社区时的康复需求。