van Tol Lisa S, Lin Tiangao, Caljouw Monique A A, Cesari Matteo, Dockery Frances, Everink Irma H J, Francis Bahaa N, Gordon Adam L, Grund Stefan, Matchekhina Luba, Bazan L Mónica Perez, Topinková Eva, Vassallo Mark A, Achterberg Wilco P, Haaksma Miriam L
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1489-1501. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01030-w. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
There is variation in organization of geriatric rehabilitation across Europe. The purpose of this study was to describe the selection criteria for referral to geriatric rehabilitation, care provided, and recovery trajectories of post-COVID-19 patients referred to geriatric rehabilitation in Europe.
This observational cohort study included 723 patients in 59 care facilities for geriatric rehabilitation across 10 countries. Patient data were collected from medical records on admission to geriatric rehabilitation (between September 2020 and October 2021), discharge, 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were recovery in daily functioning (Barthel Index) and Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) from admission to discharge. These were examined using linear mixed models with two levels (measurements nested in patients) and country as an independent variable. Random intercept and random linear slope parameters were added when they improved model fit. A survey about organization of geriatric rehabilitation for post-COVID-19 patients was filled out by country coordinators and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inductive coding of answers to open questions.
Patients had a mean age of 75.7 years old and 52.4% were male. Many countries used various combinations of the selection criteria, such as functional status, age, frailty, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, comorbidities, and cognitive impairments. Most patients received physiotherapy (88.8%) and occupational therapy (69.7%), but there was substantial variance between countries in the percentages of patients that received protein or calorie enriched diets, oxygen therapy, and other treatment components. In all countries, patients showed recovery in daily functioning and quality of life, although there was variation in between countries in rate of recovery. Daily functioning seemed to increase most rapidly in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Russia. The steepest increases in quality of life were seen in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Spain.
Post-COVID-19 patients showed recovery during geriatric rehabilitation, albeit at variable rates. The observed variation may be explained by the heterogeneity in selection criteria and care provided. This study highlights the need for harmonization of measurements in geriatric rehabilitation order to perform explanatory research and optimize geriatric rehabilitation throughout Europe to ensure optimal patient recovery.
欧洲各地老年康复的组织方式存在差异。本研究的目的是描述欧洲转诊至老年康复机构的新冠疫情后患者的转诊选择标准、所接受的护理以及康复轨迹。
这项观察性队列研究纳入了来自10个国家59家老年康复护理机构的723名患者。收集患者从进入老年康复机构(2020年9月至2021年10月期间)、出院、6周和6个月随访时的病历数据。主要和次要结局是从入院到出院期间日常功能(Barthel指数)和生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)的恢复情况。使用具有两个层次(测量嵌套在患者中)且以国家为自变量的线性混合模型对这些进行检验。当随机截距和随机线性斜率参数能改善模型拟合时将其纳入。各国协调员填写了一份关于新冠疫情后患者老年康复组织情况的调查问卷,并使用描述性统计和对开放性问题答案的归纳编码对数据进行分析。
患者的平均年龄为75.7岁,52.4%为男性。许多国家使用了多种选择标准的组合,如功能状态、年龄、虚弱程度、综合老年评估、合并症和认知障碍。大多数患者接受了物理治疗(88.8%)和职业治疗(69.7%),但各国在接受蛋白质或热量强化饮食、氧疗及其他治疗项目的患者百分比方面存在很大差异。在所有国家,患者的日常功能和生活质量都有所恢复,尽管各国的恢复速度存在差异。日常功能在捷克共和国、德国和俄罗斯似乎增长最为迅速。生活质量提升最显著的是捷克共和国、德国和西班牙。
新冠疫情后患者在老年康复期间有所恢复,尽管恢复速度各不相同。观察到的差异可能是由于选择标准和所提供护理的异质性所致。本研究强调需要统一老年康复中的测量方法,以便开展解释性研究并优化全欧洲的老年康复,确保患者实现最佳康复。