Department of Radiology, Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1425-1432. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01101-y. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Palliation of malign biliary obstruction is important which is commonly carried out by percutaneous biliary stenting. Our primary aim with this study was assessment of performance of wall stents, and nitinol stents for the palliation of malign biliary obstruction.
The medical records of 157 patients who underwent biliary stenting in our department between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2005, were retrospectively analyzed. Technical success, treatment success, mortality in the first 30 days, minor, and major complications were evaluated and compared among the wall stent, and the nitinol stent groups in all patients which constituted the primary study endpoints. Additionally, stent patency, and mean patient survival times after stent implantation were evaluated in patients for whom follow-up information could be obtained.
A total of 213 metallic stents were placed in 157 patients. Wall stent was placed in 83 of the patients with mean age, and SD of 60.4 and 13.5. Nitinol stent was placed in 74 of the patients with mean age of 57.8, and SD of 15.5. Gender ratio was equal in both groups. Biliary stent dysfunction was observed in 13 patients in each of nitinol, and wall stent groups throughout the study period. There was no statistical difference among re-occlusion rates (p = 0.91). For the nitinol stent group median primary patency time was 119 days (90-185 days CI 95%), and for the wall stent group median primary patency time was 81 days (60-150 days CI 95%).
Nitinol stents, and wall stents are safe options that can be safely used in the percutaneous treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with similar treatment and therapeutic success, low complication rates, and patency times that can extend beyond expected survival times.
恶性胆道梗阻的姑息治疗很重要,通常通过经皮胆道支架置入术来进行。我们这项研究的主要目的是评估壁式支架和镍钛诺支架在恶性胆道梗阻姑息治疗中的性能。
回顾性分析了 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2005 年 12 月 31 日期间在我科行胆道支架置入术的 157 例患者的病历资料。评估并比较了所有患者的壁式支架组和镍钛诺支架组的技术成功率、治疗成功率、30 天内死亡率、小并发症和大并发症。此外,对可获得随访信息的患者进行了支架通畅性和支架植入后平均患者生存时间的评估。
共在 157 例患者中放置了 213 枚金属支架。壁式支架组 83 例患者,平均年龄(60.4±13.5)岁;镍钛诺支架组 74 例患者,平均年龄(57.8±15.5)岁。两组性别比例相等。在整个研究期间,镍钛诺支架组和壁式支架组各有 13 例患者出现胆道支架功能障碍。再闭塞率无统计学差异(p=0.91)。镍钛诺支架组中位初次通畅时间为 119 天(90185 天 95%CI),壁式支架组中位初次通畅时间为 81 天(60150 天 95%CI)。
镍钛诺支架和壁式支架是安全的选择,可以安全地用于经皮治疗恶性胆道梗阻,具有相似的治疗和治疗成功率、低并发症发生率以及可以延长预期生存时间的通畅时间。