Suppr超能文献

自报的生育偏好是否存在偏差?来自间接启发法的证据。

Are self-reported fertility preferences biased? Evidence from indirect elicitation methods.

机构信息

School of Economics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.

Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3062, Netherlands.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 20;121(34):e2407629121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407629121. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

Desired fertility measures are routinely collected and used by researchers and policy makers, but their self-reported nature raises the possibility of reporting bias. In this paper, we test for the presence of such bias by comparing responses to direct survey questions with indirect questions offering a varying, randomized, degree of confidentiality to respondents in a socioeconomically diverse sample of Nigerian women ([Formula: see text]). We find that women report higher fertility preferences when asked indirectly, but only when their responses afford them complete confidentiality, not when their responses are simply blind to the enumerator. Our results suggest that there may be fewer unintended pregnancies than currently thought and that the effectiveness of family planning policy targeting may be weakened by the bias we uncover. We conclude with suggestions for future work on how to mitigate reporting bias.

摘要

研究人员和政策制定者通常会收集和使用期望生育率数据,但由于这些数据是自我报告的,因此可能存在报告偏差。在本文中,我们通过比较直接调查问题和间接问题的回答,在一个社会经济多样化的尼日利亚女性样本中,为受访者提供不同程度的、随机的、保密程度的间接问题,以此来检验是否存在这种偏差([公式:见正文])。我们发现,当被间接询问时,女性报告的生育意愿更高,但只有当她们的回答完全保密时才会这样,而不是简单地对调查员隐瞒时才会这样。我们的结果表明,可能存在的意外怀孕比目前认为的要少,而我们发现的这种偏差可能会削弱以目标人群为对象的计划生育政策的有效性。最后,我们提出了关于如何减轻报告偏差的未来工作建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7359/11348086/365889acbafc/pnas.2407629121fig01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验