• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证以移动设备为中心的数字健康准备度量表(mDiHERS):健康素养和公平量表。

Development and Validation of a Mobile-Centered Digital Health Readiness Scale (mDiHERS): Health Literacy and Equity Scale.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Hoseo University, Asan, Republic of Korea.

School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 13;26:e58497. doi: 10.2196/58497.

DOI:10.2196/58497
PMID:39137409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11350292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a rapid expansion of digital health care services, making the need for measuring and improving digital health readiness a priority. In response, our study team developed the Mobile-Centered Digital Health Readiness: Health Literacy and Equity Scale (mDiHERS) to measure digital health readiness.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to develop and validate a scale that assesses digital health readiness, encompassing literacy and equity, and to ensure the effective use of mobile-centered digital health services.

METHODS

This study was conducted from October 2021 to October 2022 to develop and validate the mDiHERS. Participants included patients with inflammatory bowel disease, which is a chronic condition requiring continuous management, and experts in medical and nursing informatics. The scale development involved a literature review, focus group interviews, and content validity evaluations. A total of 440 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were recruited for the validation phase, with 403 completing the survey. The scale's validity and reliability were assessed through exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach α. The scale was translated into English by translators and bilingual and native researchers, ensuring its applicability in diverse settings.

RESULTS

The mDiHERS consists of 36 items across 6 domains, with a 5-point Likert scale for responses. The validation process confirmed the scale's construct validity, with 4 factors explaining 65.05% of the total variance. The scale's reliability was established with Cronbach α values ranging from 0.84 to 0.91. The scale's development considered the technical proficiency necessary for engaging with health mobile apps and devices, reflecting the importance of subjective confidence and objective skills in digital health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The mDiHERS is a validated tool for measuring patients' readiness and ability to use digital health services. The mDiHERS assesses user characteristics, digital accessibility, literacy, and equity to contribute to the effective use of digital health services and improve accessibility. The development and validation of the mDiHERS emphasize the importance of confidence and competence in managing health digitally. Continuous improvements are necessary to ensure that all patients can benefit from digital health care.

摘要

背景

数字医疗服务迅速扩展,这使得衡量和提高数字健康准备程度成为当务之急。有鉴于此,我们的研究团队开发了以移动为中心的数字健康准备度:健康素养和公平量表(mDiHERS)来衡量数字健康准备度。

目的

我们旨在开发和验证一种能够评估数字健康准备度的量表,涵盖素养和公平,并确保移动为中心的数字医疗服务得以有效利用。

方法

本研究于 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月期间开展,以开发和验证 mDiHERS。参与者包括患有炎症性肠病的患者,这是一种需要持续管理的慢性病,以及医学和护理信息学方面的专家。量表开发包括文献回顾、焦点小组访谈和内容有效性评估。共有 440 名炎症性肠病患者参加了验证阶段,其中 403 名完成了调查。通过探索性因子分析和 Cronbach α 评估量表的有效性和可靠性。该量表由翻译人员和双语及母语研究人员翻译成英文,以确保其在不同环境中的适用性。

结果

mDiHERS 由 6 个领域的 36 个项目组成,回答采用 5 级 Likert 量表。验证过程证实了量表的结构有效性,4 个因子解释了总方差的 65.05%。量表的可靠性通过 Cronbach α 值确定,范围为 0.84 至 0.91。量表的开发考虑了使用健康移动应用程序和设备所需的技术熟练程度,反映了数字健康素养中主观信心和客观技能的重要性。

结论

mDiHERS 是一种经过验证的工具,可用于衡量患者使用数字医疗服务的准备情况和能力。mDiHERS 评估用户特征、数字可及性、素养和公平,有助于数字医疗服务的有效利用和提高可及性。mDiHERS 的开发和验证强调了数字化管理健康的信心和能力的重要性。需要不断改进以确保所有患者都能受益于数字医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f3/11350292/d8ef4ff3ed80/jmir_v26i1e58497_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f3/11350292/3d70e38813a0/jmir_v26i1e58497_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f3/11350292/d8ef4ff3ed80/jmir_v26i1e58497_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f3/11350292/3d70e38813a0/jmir_v26i1e58497_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9f3/11350292/d8ef4ff3ed80/jmir_v26i1e58497_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Mobile-Centered Digital Health Readiness Scale (mDiHERS): Health Literacy and Equity Scale.开发并验证以移动设备为中心的数字健康准备度量表(mDiHERS):健康素养和公平量表。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 13;26:e58497. doi: 10.2196/58497.
2
Measuring a Broad Spectrum of eHealth Skills in the Web 3.0 Context Using an eHealth Literacy Scale: Development and Validation Study.在 Web 3.0 背景下使用电子健康素养量表衡量广泛的电子健康技能:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 23;23(9):e31627. doi: 10.2196/31627.
3
Problem-Based mHealth Literacy Scale (PB-mHLS): Development and Validation.基于问题的移动健康素养量表 (PB-mHLS):编制与验证。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Apr 8;10(4):e31459. doi: 10.2196/31459.
4
Assessing Competencies Needed to Engage With Digital Health Services: Development of the eHealth Literacy Assessment Toolkit.评估参与数字健康服务所需的能力:电子健康素养评估工具包的开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 10;20(5):e178. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8347.
5
A 3-Item Measure of Digital Health Care Literacy: Development and Validation Study.数字医疗保健素养的三项测量指标:开发与验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 29;6(4):e36043. doi: 10.2196/36043.
6
Everyday Digital Literacy Questionnaire for Older Adults: Instrument Development and Validation Study.老年人日常数字素养问卷:工具开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 14;25:e51616. doi: 10.2196/51616.
7
Validity Testing and Cultural Adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Among People With Chronic Diseases in Taiwan: Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)在台湾慢性病患者中的有效性检验和文化调适:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e32855. doi: 10.2196/32855.
8
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
9
Adapting the eHealth Literacy Scale for Carers of People With Chronic Diseases (eHeals-Carer) in a Sample of Greek and Cypriot Carers of People With Dementia: Reliability and Validation Study.在希腊和塞浦路斯痴呆症患者照料者样本中改编慢性病患者照料者的电子健康素养量表(eHeals-Carer):信效度研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 28;21(11):e12504. doi: 10.2196/12504.
10
Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)第二部分的有效性证据:在澳大利亚社区卫生环境中评估测试内容、反应过程和内部结构的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 8;24(3):e32777. doi: 10.2196/32777.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Smart Health Care Service Using Metaverse and Chatbot Technologies for Adolescents, Parents, and School Health Teachers: User-Centered Design Approach.使用元宇宙和聊天机器人技术为青少年、家长和学校健康教师开发智能医疗服务:以用户为中心的设计方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 3;27:e69190. doi: 10.2196/69190.
2
Era of Digital Healthcare: Emergence of the Smart Patient.数字医疗时代:智能患者的出现。
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Jan;31(1):107-110. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.107. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
Service Design and Evaluation of OpenNotes for Craniofacial Deformity Management in Patients and their Caregivers.

本文引用的文献

1
Review and content analysis of mobile apps for inflammatory bowel disease management using the mobile application rating scale (MARS): Systematic search in app stores.采用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)对用于炎症性肠病管理的移动应用程序进行回顾和内容分析:应用商店中的系统检索。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Dec;180:105249. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105249. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
2
Digital literacy as a new determinant of health: A scoping review.数字素养作为健康的新决定因素:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000279. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: results from an international consensus meeting.
颅面畸形患者及其护理人员的开放式病历的服务设计与评估
Healthc Inform Res. 2024 Oct;30(4):333-343. doi: 10.4258/hir.2024.30.4.333. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
难治性炎症性肠病:国际共识会议的结果。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Sep;8(9):853-859. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00154-1. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
A Systematic Review of Self-Management Interventions for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者自我管理干预措施的系统评价
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2023 Mar 27;8(1):1-12. doi: 10.1159/000530021. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Use of Behavior Change Techniques and Quality of Commercially Available Inflammatory Bowel Disease Apps.行为改变技术的应用与商业可用炎症性肠病应用程序的质量
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jul;68(7):2908-2920. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07884-7. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
6
Development and Internal Validation of the Digital Health Readiness Questionnaire: Prospective Single-Center Survey Study.数字健康准备度问卷的制定与内部验证:前瞻性单中心调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 10;25:e41615. doi: 10.2196/41615.
7
Digital healthcare services.数字医疗服务。
Electron Mark. 2021;31(4):743-746. doi: 10.1007/s12525-021-00513-z. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
8
Digital Inclusion as Health Care - Supporting Health Care Equity with Digital-Infrastructure Initiatives.数字包容作为医疗保健——通过数字基础设施举措支持医疗保健公平性。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1101-1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2115646. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale: Psychometric Evaluation.《韩国版健康信息技术可用性评估量表的效度与信度:心理测量学评价》
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 24;10(1):e28621. doi: 10.2196/28621.
10
Focusing on Digital Health Equity.关注数字健康公平性。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1795-1796. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18459.