• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨护理学生反思会议中的交流互动:一项定性研究。

Exploring communicative interactions in debriefing sessions with nursing students: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Igualada, Spain.

Department of Nursing, University Rovira Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Nov;142:106334. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106334. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106334
PMID:39137449
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Debriefing as a learning activity aims to elevate participants' competence through communicative interaction. This activity is an integral component of any formative simulation. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to explore debriefing as a communicative experience in nursing students within the context of interactive virtual simulation. The secondary objectives were: 1) To investigate the typology of interactions based on participants' discourse and 2) To identify the actions that students use to develop knowledge during debriefing.

METHOD

A qualitative exploratory study design involving six debriefing groups was conducted with 105 s-year nursing students. The debriefing sessions were analyzed following interactive virtual simulations in an in-person setting in the classroom. All sessions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A mixed (deductive and inductive) content analysis approach was used.

RESULTS

A total of 2187 units of meaning were identified and categorized into 3 themes (interaction by participant, interaction by communicative action, and interaction by participant's communicative goal); nine subthemes (facilitator-student, student-student and student-facilitator; declarative - unidirectional, reactive - bidirectional and multidirectional-interactive; individualistic, competitive, and collaborative), and 5 categories (providing information; generating creative solutions; processing critical and deliberative information; positive interdependence and psychosocial relationships).

CONCLUSION

The students developed knowledge and practical communication skills, particularly reinforcing soft skills through collaborative interactions, predominantly multidirectional-interactive in nature. The facilitator and the interpersonal relationships among the participants fostered a safe and positive environment.

摘要

简介

作为一种学习活动,汇报旨在通过交流互动来提高参与者的能力。这一活动是任何形成性模拟的组成部分。因此,本研究的主要目的是探讨在互动式虚拟模拟中护理学生的汇报作为一种交流体验。次要目标是:1)根据参与者的话语探讨互动的类型,2)确定学生在汇报中用于发展知识的行动。

方法

采用定性探索性研究设计,在课堂实地环境中对六组汇报进行了研究,共有 105 名护理专业四年级学生参与。在进行了互动式虚拟模拟后对汇报进行了分析。所有会议都进行了录音和逐字记录。采用了混合(演绎和归纳)内容分析方法。

结果

共确定了 2187 个意义单位,并将其分为 3 个主题(参与者的互动、参与者的交流行为的互动和参与者的交流目标的互动);9 个子主题(促进者-学生、学生-学生和学生-促进者;陈述性-单向、反应性-双向和多向互动;个人主义、竞争和协作)和 5 个类别(提供信息、生成创造性解决方案、处理关键和审议信息、积极的相互依存和心理社会关系)。

结论

学生发展了知识和实际沟通技巧,特别是通过协作互动,主要是多向互动,加强了软技能。促进者和参与者之间的人际关系营造了一个安全和积极的环境。

相似文献

1
Exploring communicative interactions in debriefing sessions with nursing students: A qualitative study.探讨护理学生反思会议中的交流互动:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Nov;142:106334. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106334. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Nurse simulation facilitator experiences learning open dialogue techniques to encourage self-reflection in debriefing.护士模拟促进者体验学习开放对话技术,以鼓励在汇报中进行自我反思。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Aug;79:142-146. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
Prelicensure nursing students' perspectives on video-assisted debriefing following high fidelity simulation: A qualitative study.护理专业学生在高仿真模拟后对视频辅助讨论的看法:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Aug;79:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 7.
5
Nursing Simulation Debriefing: Useful Tools.护理模拟讲评:有用的工具。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;56(3):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2021.05.003.
6
In-simulation Debriefing Increases Therapeutic Communication Skills.模拟情境后析提升治疗性沟通技能。
Nurse Educ. 2019 Nov/Dec;44(6):295-299. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000643.
7
Factors Affecting Nursing Students' Reflective Thinking During Simulation Debriefing.影响护生模拟讲评中反思性思维的因素。
Nurse Educ. 2024;49(3):E120-E125. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001560. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Survey of factors influencing learner engagement with simulation debriefing among nursing students.护理专业学生参与模拟演练汇报相关影响因素的调查
Nurs Health Sci. 2017 Dec;19(4):485-491. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12371. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Perceptions of video-facilitated debriefing in simulation education among nursing students: Findings from a Q-methodology study.护理专业学生对模拟教育中视频辅助讨论的看法:一项 Q 方法研究的结果。
J Prof Nurs. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(2):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
10
Putting practice into teaching: an exploratory study of nursing undergraduates' interpersonal skills and the effects of using empirical data as a teaching and learning resource.将实践融入教学:一项关于护理本科生人际技能以及使用实证数据作为教学资源的效果的探索性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2297-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01948.x.