ADEA Appointee, Executive Committee, Coalition for Modernizing Dental Licensure, Chicago, IL, USA
Professor of Dental Medicine, Division of General Dentistry, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
J Dent Hyg. 2024 Aug;98(4):37-49.
Concerns regarding the ethical justification for the use of single-encounter, procedure-based examinations on live patients for the licensure of dental hygienists and dentists in the United States persists despite decades of debate and publication on the subject. The purpose of this literature review was to summarize the specific ethical concerns and quantify recommendations in favor or against this examination methodology. A population, intervention, control or comparison, outcome (PICO) question was developed to review the topic as follows: "For individuals receiving dental care as part of determination of candidates for competency and readiness for licensure, do patient-based licensure examinations, as compared to other assessment methods, violate or infringe upon ethical principles or ethical standards for health care or society?" An electronic search was performed in three databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Embase. Key search terms and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) included the following: ethics, clinical, competence, dental, dental hygiene, dentistry, education, licensure, live patient, and practice. Ethical concerns about the use of patient examinations have been published in the professional literature for over 35 years. Of the 29 selected or endpoint articles identified, 27 articles cited one or more ethical concerns relating to single-encounter patient-based examinations while 20 articles recommended the elimination of this type of examination with an additional 6 articles citing elimination as an option in resolving the ethical issues regarding this type of licensure examination. The literature holds a predominant, prevailing professional opinion that single-encounter, procedure-based examinations on live patients presents significant ethical concerns and should be eliminated as a method in initial dental hygiene and dental licensure. The literature also suggests that state dental boards should initiate corrective regulatory or legislative actions to expeditiously end recognition of live patient examinations in their licensure processes.
尽管几十年来一直在就该主题进行辩论和发表相关文章,但美国仍有人对在活体患者身上进行单次接触、基于程序的检查以获得牙科保健员和牙医执照的做法的伦理合理性提出质疑。本文综述的目的是总结具体的伦理问题,并对支持或反对这种检查方法的建议进行量化。为了审查该主题,制定了一个人群、干预、对照或比较、结局 (PICO) 问题,如下所示:“对于作为确定候选人能力和准备获得许可的一部分而接受牙科护理的个人,与其他评估方法相比,基于患者的许可检查是否违反或侵犯了医疗保健或社会的伦理原则或伦理标准?”在三个数据库中进行了电子搜索:PubMed/Medline、Scopus 和 Embase。关键搜索词和医学主题词 (MeSH) 包括以下内容:伦理、临床、能力、牙科、牙科保健、牙科、教育、许可、活体患者和实践。关于使用患者检查的伦理问题已经在专业文献中发表了 35 年以上。在所确定的 29 篇文章中,27 篇文章引用了一个或多个与基于单次接触的患者检查相关的伦理问题,而 20 篇文章建议取消这种类型的检查,另外 6 篇文章则认为取消这种类型的许可检查是解决此类伦理问题的一种选择。文献中普遍存在一种主要的专业观点,即基于单次接触、基于程序的活体患者检查存在重大伦理问题,应作为初始牙科保健和牙科许可的一种方法予以淘汰。文献还表明,州牙科委员会应采取纠正性监管或立法行动,迅速停止在其许可程序中承认活体患者检查。