City Hospital, St Petersburg, Russia.
Science Valley Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Aug 13;29(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02008-x.
Trimodulin (human polyvalent immunoglobulin [Ig] M ~ 23%, IgA ~ 21%, IgG ~ 56% preparation) has previously been associated with a lower mortality rate in a subpopulation of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and with clear signs of inflammation. The hypothesis for the ESsCOVID trial was that trimodulin may prevent inflammation-driven progression of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to critical disease or even death.
Adults with severe COVID-19 were randomised to receive intravenous infusions of trimodulin or placebo for 5 consecutive days in addition to standard of care. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of clinical deterioration (Days 6-29) and 28-day all-cause mortality (Days 1-29).
One-hundred-and-sixty-six patients received trimodulin (n = 84) or placebo (n = 82). Thirty-three patients died, nine during the treatment phase. Overall, 84.9% and 76.5% of patients completed treatment and follow-up, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint was reported in 33.3% of patients on trimodulin and 34.1% of patients on placebo (P = 0.912). No differences were observed in the proportion of patients recovered on Day 29, days of invasive mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit-free days. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable. A post hoc analysis was conducted in patients with early systemic inflammation by excluding those with high CRP (> 150 mg/L) and/or D-dimer (≥ 3 mg/L) and/or low platelet counts (< 130 × 10/L) at baseline. Forty-seven patients in the trimodulin group and 49 in the placebo group met these criteria. A difference of 15.5 percentage points in clinical deterioration and mortality was observed in favour of trimodulin (95% confidence interval: -4.46, 34.78; P = 0.096).
Although there was no difference in the primary outcome in the overall population, observations in a subgroup of patients with early systemic inflammation suggest that trimodulin may have potential in this setting that warrants further investigation. ESSCOVID WAS REGISTERED PROSPECTIVELY AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ON OCTOBER 6, 2020.: NCT04576728.
三价蛋白(人多价免疫球蛋白[Ig]M23%,IgA21%,IgG~56%制剂)先前与接受有创机械通气(IMV)的严重社区获得性肺炎患者亚群的死亡率降低相关,并伴有明显的炎症迹象。ESsCOVID 试验的假设是,三价蛋白可能预防严重 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)向危急疾病甚至死亡的炎症驱动进展。
将患有严重 COVID-19 的成年人随机分配接受静脉输注三价蛋白或安慰剂,连续 5 天,同时接受标准治疗。主要疗效终点是临床恶化(第 6-29 天)和 28 天全因死亡率(第 1-29 天)的综合指标。
166 名患者接受了三价蛋白(n=84)或安慰剂(n=82)治疗。33 名患者死亡,其中 9 名在治疗阶段死亡。总体而言,84.9%和 76.5%的患者分别完成了治疗和随访。三价蛋白组有 33.3%的患者和安慰剂组有 34.1%的患者报告了主要疗效终点(P=0.912)。两组在第 29 天恢复的患者比例、有创机械通气天数或无 ICU 天数方面无差异。治疗中出现的不良事件发生率相当。对基线时 CRP(>150mg/L)和/或 D-二聚体(≥3mg/L)和/或血小板计数(<130×10/L)较高的患者进行排除后,对早期全身炎症患者进行了一项事后分析。三价蛋白组有 47 名患者和安慰剂组有 49 名患者符合这些标准。三价蛋白组临床恶化和死亡率的差异为 15.5 个百分点,有利于三价蛋白(95%置信区间:-4.46,34.78;P=0.096)。
尽管总体人群的主要结局无差异,但对早期全身炎症患者亚组的观察结果表明,三价蛋白在这种情况下可能具有潜在作用,值得进一步研究。ESsCOVID 于 2020 年 10 月 6 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了前瞻性注册:NCT04576728。