• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

20年期间的听力损失与年收入:HUNT队列研究

Hearing Loss and Annual Earnings Over a 20-Year Period: The HUNT Cohort Study.

作者信息

Jørgensen Astrid Ytrehus, Engdahl Bo, Bratsberg Bernt, Mehlum Ingrid Sivesind, Hoffman Howard J, Aarhus Lisa

机构信息

Department of Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Chronic Diseases and Ageing, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2025;46(1):121-127. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001554. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001554
PMID:39138599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11637570/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The association between hearing loss and income has only been examined in cross-sectional studies. We aim to study annual increase in earnings over 20 years, comparing people with and without hearing loss.

DESIGN

We used data from a population-based hearing study in Norway (The Trøndelag Health Study, 1996-1998), including 14,825 persons (46.2% men, mean age at baseline 30.6 years, age range 20 to 40 years). Hearing loss was defined as the pure-tone average threshold of 0.5 to 4 kHz in the better hearing ear ≥20 dB HL (n = 230). Annual earnings were assessed from 1997 to 2017. Longitudinal analyses were performed with linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and education.

RESULTS

People without hearing loss at baseline (before age 40) had a greater annual increase in earnings over a 20-year follow-up period compared with people with hearing loss. For people with normal hearing, annual earnings over 20 years increased by 453 Euro (EUR) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 384 to 522) or 13.2% more per year than for people with hearing loss, adjusted for age and sex. The difference in annual earnings over 20 year was greater among women (462 EUR, 95% CI = 376 to 547) than men (424 EUR, 95% CI = 315 to 533), greater among younger than older adults, and greater among lower than higher educated persons. When including adjustment for education in the model, in addition to age and sex, the difference in annual earnings over 20 years between persons with and without hearing loss was reduced (337 EUR, 95% CI = 269 to 405).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this large population-based study indicates that people with hearing loss experience lower long-term earnings growth compared with people with normal hearing. The findings highlight the need for increased interventions in the workplace for people with hearing loss.

摘要

目的

听力损失与收入之间的关联仅在横断面研究中得到检验。我们旨在研究20年间收入的年度增长情况,比较有听力损失和无听力损失的人群。

设计

我们使用了挪威一项基于人群的听力研究(特隆赫姆健康研究,1996 - 1998年)的数据,包括14825人(男性占46.2%,基线平均年龄30.6岁,年龄范围20至40岁)。听力损失定义为较好耳0.5至4千赫兹的纯音平均阈值≥20分贝听力级(n = 230)。评估了1997年至2017年的年收入。采用线性混合模型进行纵向分析,并对年龄、性别和教育程度进行了调整。

结果

在基线时(40岁之前)无听力损失的人群在20年随访期内的年收入增长幅度大于有听力损失的人群。对于听力正常的人群,在调整年龄和性别后,20年的年收入比有听力损失的人群增加了453欧元(95%置信区间[CI] = 384至522),即每年多增加13.2%。20年的年收入差异在女性中(462欧元,95% CI = 376至547)大于男性(424欧元,95% CI = 315至533),在年轻人中大于老年人,在低学历人群中大于高学历人群。当在模型中纳入教育程度调整,以及年龄和性别调整时,有听力损失和无听力损失人群20年的年收入差异减小(337欧元,95% CI = 269至405)。

结论

这项基于大量人群的研究结果表明,与听力正常的人群相比,有听力损失的人群长期收入增长较低。研究结果凸显了在工作场所对有听力损失的人群加强干预的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9710/11637570/a59cfc076931/aud-46-121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9710/11637570/a59cfc076931/aud-46-121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9710/11637570/a59cfc076931/aud-46-121-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Hearing Loss and Annual Earnings Over a 20-Year Period: The HUNT Cohort Study.20年期间的听力损失与年收入:HUNT队列研究
Ear Hear. 2025;46(1):121-127. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001554. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Occupational noise exposure and asymmetric hearing loss: Results from the HUNT population study in Norway.职业性噪声暴露与非对称性听力损失:来自挪威 HUNT 人群研究的结果。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Jun;63(6):535-542. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23105. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
Childhood Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Educational Attainment in Adulthood: Results From the HUNT Study.儿童感音神经性听力损失与成年后的受教育程度:来自 HUNT 研究的结果。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1359-1367. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000716.
4
Weaker association between hearing loss and non-employment in recent generations: the HUNT cohort study.近几代人中听力损失与未就业之间的关联较弱:HUNT队列研究
Int J Audiol. 2023 Apr;62(4):312-319. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2045367. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
Hearing threshold and physical performance in older people: a cross-sectional study from the HUNT4 cohort.老年人的听力阈值和身体表现:来自 HUNT4 队列的横断面研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Feb;14(1):165-172. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022-00713-6. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with hearing loss in older adults: a cross-sectional study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).与老年人听力损失相关的社会经济和生活方式因素:英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):e031030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031030.
7
Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among a Representative Sample of Canadian Children and Adolescents, 3 to 19 Years of Age.3至19岁加拿大儿童和青少年代表性样本中的听力损失患病率
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):7-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000345.
8
Association Between Childhood Hearing Disorders and Tinnitus in Adulthood.儿童听力障碍与成人耳鸣之间的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov;141(11):983-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2378.
9
Better Hearing in Norway: A Comparison of Two HUNT Cohorts 20 Years Apart.挪威听力改善:相隔20年的两个HUNT队列比较
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):42-52. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000898.
10
The Nord-Trøndelag Norway Audiometric Survey 1996-98: unscreened thresholds and prevalence of hearing impairment for adults > 20 years.1996 - 1998年挪威北特伦德拉格郡听力测定调查:20岁以上成年人的未筛查阈值及听力障碍患病率
Noise Health. 2005 Jul-Sep;7(28):1-15. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.31632.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Adult-Onset Hearing Loss and Income: A Systematic Review.成人听力损失与收入的关系:系统评价。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):931-939. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001396. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
2
Hearing loss, sick leave, and disability pension: findings from the HUNT follow-up study.听力损失、病假和残疾抚恤金:HUNT 随访研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1340. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13760-2.
3
Weaker association between hearing loss and non-employment in recent generations: the HUNT cohort study.近几代人中听力损失与未就业之间的关联较弱:HUNT队列研究
Int J Audiol. 2023 Apr;62(4):312-319. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2045367. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
Hearing loss and access to audiology services in rural victoria: Findings from the crossroads study.维多利亚州农村地区的听力损失与听力服务可及性:十字路口研究的结果
Noise Health. 2019 Sep-Oct;21(102):217-222. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_5_18.
5
Better Hearing in Norway: A Comparison of Two HUNT Cohorts 20 Years Apart.挪威听力改善:相隔20年的两个HUNT队列比较
Ear Hear. 2021 Jan/Feb;42(1):42-52. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000898.
6
Childhood Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Educational Attainment in Adulthood: Results From the HUNT Study.儿童感音神经性听力损失与成年后的受教育程度:来自 HUNT 研究的结果。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1359-1367. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000716.
7
Socioeconomic differences in hearing among middle-aged and older adults: cross-sectional analyses using the Health Survey for England.中年及老年成年人听力方面的社会经济差异:基于英格兰健康调查的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 1;8(2):e019615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019615.
8
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年全球、区域和国家310种疾病和损伤的发病率、患病率及伤残调整生命年:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
9
Hearing Impairment Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究中的听力障碍患病率及相关风险因素
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jul;141(7):641-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.0889.
10
The socioeconomic impact of hearing loss in U.S. adults.美国成年人听力损失的社会经济影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):545-50. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000562.