Taha Seyed R, Boulos Fouad
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Histopathology. 2025 Feb;86(3):327-340. doi: 10.1111/his.15295. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Categorizing breast neoplasia as ductal or lobular is a daily exercise that relies on a combination of histologic and immunohistochemical tools. The historically robust link between loss of the E-cadherin molecule and lobular neoplasia has rendered staining for E-cadherin by immunohistochemistry a staple of this diagnostic process. Unfortunately, discordances between E-cadherin expression and histomorphology, and variations in E-cadherin staining patterns and intensities abound in clinical practice, but are often neglected in favour of a binary interpretation of the E-cadherin result. In this article, we highlight the complexities of E-cadherin expression through a review of the E-cadherin protein and its associated gene (CDH1), the mechanisms leading to aberrant/absent E-cadherin expression, and the implications of these factors on the reliability of the E-cadherin immunohistochemical stain in the classification of ductal versus lobular mammary neoplasia.
将乳腺肿瘤分类为导管型或小叶型是一项日常工作,它依赖于组织学和免疫组织化学工具的结合。从历史上看,E-钙黏蛋白分子缺失与小叶肿瘤之间存在着牢固的联系,这使得通过免疫组织化学对E-钙黏蛋白进行染色成为这一诊断过程的主要方法。不幸的是,在临床实践中,E-钙黏蛋白表达与组织形态学之间存在不一致,并且E-钙黏蛋白染色模式和强度存在差异,但人们常常忽略这些情况,而倾向于对E-钙黏蛋白结果进行二元解读。在本文中,我们通过回顾E-钙黏蛋白蛋白及其相关基因(CDH1)、导致E-钙黏蛋白表达异常/缺失的机制,以及这些因素对E-钙黏蛋白免疫组织化学染色在导管型与小叶型乳腺肿瘤分类中的可靠性的影响,来突出E-钙黏蛋白表达的复杂性。