Suppr超能文献

护理网络之间的转换:荷兰老年人的一项前瞻性研究。

Transitions between care networks: a prospective study among older adults in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Gardeniers Maura K M, Huisman Martijn, Meijboom Erik Jan, Hoogendijk Emiel O, Broese van Groenou Marjolein I

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1081, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2024 Aug 13;21(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s10433-024-00817-x.

Abstract

As health impairment increases, older adults utilize care from different types of caregivers, but little is known about changes in the composition of care networks. We mapped the transitions between different care networks to gain insight into which people develop care networks that include informal, privately and publicly paid care. We used three waves (2012-2015-2018) of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam with 1413 Dutch community-dwelling adults, aged 64-100. Network types were identified using six types of caregivers: (1) co-resident, (2) non-co-resident children, (3) other kin, (4) neighbours/friends/acquaintances, (5) publicly paid, (6) privately paid, in a latent transition analysis with mortality and moving to a care facility as missing states. Five types of care networks were identified: (1) no care, (2) privately paid, (3) mixed informal, (4) mixed publicly paid, (5) co-resident. The co-resident network was the most unstable and had a high transition rate to nursing homes. Participants from the privately paid care network often transitioned to a mixed informal network and rarely transitioned to a mixed publicly paid network. Transitions out of the no-care network were mostly to the privately paid network. The two mixed care networks were the most stable. Transitions appeared to be most triggered by deteriorating health. Transitions to institutional care were most likely in the mixed informal, mixed publicly paid and the co-resident network. Thus, these networks appear to require additional support to facilitate ageing in place.

摘要

随着健康损害的增加,老年人会利用不同类型照料者的照料,但对于照料网络构成的变化却知之甚少。我们绘制了不同照料网络之间的转变情况,以深入了解哪些人会形成包含非正式照料、私人付费照料和公共付费照料的照料网络。我们使用了阿姆斯特丹纵向老龄化研究的三波数据(2012年 - 2015年 - 2018年),样本为1413名年龄在64 - 100岁的荷兰社区居住成年人。在一项将死亡和搬入护理机构作为缺失状态的潜在转变分析中,使用六种照料者类型来确定网络类型:(1)同住者,(2)非同住子女,(3)其他亲属,(4)邻居/朋友/熟人,(5)公共付费照料者,(6)私人付费照料者。确定了五种照料网络类型:(1)无照料,(2)私人付费,(3)混合非正式照料,(4)混合公共付费照料,(5)同住照料。同住照料网络最不稳定,向养老院的转变率很高。来自私人付费照料网络的参与者通常会转变为混合非正式照料网络,很少转变为混合公共付费照料网络。无照料网络的转变大多是转向私人付费照料网络。两种混合照料网络最稳定。转变似乎主要由健康状况恶化引发。向机构照料的转变在混合非正式照料、混合公共付费照料和同住照料网络中最为可能。因此,这些网络似乎需要额外的支持以促进就地养老。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e82e/11322471/ec81e99ec93b/10433_2024_817_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验