• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除的精准选择

Accurate Selection of Sublobar Resection for Small Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

作者信息

Motono Nozomu, Mizoguchi Takaki, Ishikawa Masahito, Iwai Shun, Iijima Yoshihito, Uramoto Hidetaka

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Ishikawa, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):811-822. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16027-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16027-9
PMID:39138778
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although sublobar resection (wedge resection [Wed] or segmentectomy [Seg]) has become a standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, the impact of this procedure on the prognosis and postoperative complications in real-world clinical practice is unknown.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed risk factors for a poor prognosis and postoperative complications of 470 patients with clinical stage ≤ IA2 NSCLC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021.

RESULTS

Among the patients with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) higher than 0.5, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in the Wed group (72.1%) than in the Seg (85.8%) and Lob (86.8%) groups (p < 0.01), but the difference between the Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Among patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower, the 5-year RFS rate did not differ significantly among the three groups. Multivariable analysis of RFS showed that the prognosis was significantly worse in the Wed group than in the Lob group (hazard ratio, 2.83; p < 0.01), but the difference between the Wed and Seg groups or the between Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Multivariable analysis of postoperative complications showed a significantly lower risk in the Wed group than in the Seg group (odds ratio, 0.31; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Seg could become the standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 NSCLC patients. Wed is suggested to be an option for patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower and has the advantage of avoiding postoperative complications.

摘要

背景

尽管在日本,亚肺叶切除术(楔形切除术[Wed]或肺段切除术[Seg])已成为临床IA1期和IA2期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准手术方式,但在实际临床实践中,该手术对预后和术后并发症的影响尚不清楚。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了2012年至2021年接受手术的470例临床分期≤IA2期NSCLC患者预后不良和术后并发症的危险因素。

结果

在实变与肿瘤比值(CTR)高于0.5的患者中,楔形切除术组的5年无复发生存率(RFS)显著低于肺段切除术组(85.8%)和肺叶切除术组(86.8%)(72.1%)(p<0.01),但肺段切除术组和肺叶切除术组之间的差异不显著。在CTR为0.5或更低的患者中,三组之间的5年RFS率无显著差异。RFS的多变量分析显示,楔形切除术组的预后显著差于肺叶切除术组(风险比,2.83;p<0.01),但楔形切除术组与肺段切除术组之间或肺段切除术组与肺叶切除术组之间的差异不显著。术后并发症的多变量分析显示,楔形切除术组的风险显著低于肺段切除术组(比值比,0.31;p<0.01)。

结论

肺段切除术可成为临床IA1期和IA2期NSCLC患者的标准手术方式。对于CTR为0.5或更低的患者,楔形切除术是一种选择,且具有避免术后并发症的优势。

相似文献

1
Accurate Selection of Sublobar Resection for Small Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.小非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除的精准选择
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):811-822. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16027-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm.外科医生更倾向于对小于 3cm 的 I 期非小细胞肺癌行亚肺叶切除术。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Apr;11(4):907-917. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13336. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
3
Is Sublobar Resection Feasible for High-Risk Pathologic Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer?亚肺叶切除术对高风险病理I期非小细胞肺癌是否可行?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):4161-4172. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16700-z. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
Risk factor analysis of locoregional recurrence after sublobar resection in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.临床ⅠA 期非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除术后局部区域复发的危险因素分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.057.
5
Wedge resection versus segmentectomy in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer unfit for lobectomy.楔形切除术与肺段切除术治疗不适合肺叶切除术的 I 期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 27;49(12):1134-1142. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz122.
6
Long-Term Results for Clinical Stage IA Lung Cancer: Comparing Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection.临床ⅠA 期肺癌的长期结果:肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):375-381. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.049. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Outcomes after lobar versus sublobar resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease.肺叶切除术与亚肺叶切除术治疗特发性肺纤维化合并临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Sep;154(3):1089-1096.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.116. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Comparison of segmentectomy and wedge resection for cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.cT1cN0M0期非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术与楔形切除术的比较
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;73(2):110-117. doi: 10.1007/s11748-024-02058-2. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
Prognosis After Sublobar Resection of Small-sized Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Visceral Pleural or Lymphovascular Invasion.伴有脏层胸膜或脉管侵犯的小尺寸非小细胞肺癌亚肺叶切除术后的预后
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2769-2777. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4075-7.
10
Ten-Year Follow-Up of Lung Cancer Patients with Resected Stage IA Invasive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.IA 期可切除浸润性非小细胞肺癌患者的 10 年随访结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;31(9):5729-5737. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15572-7. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Performing High-Quality Sublobar Resections: Key Differences Between Wedge Resection and Segmentectomy.实施高质量亚肺叶切除术:楔形切除术与肺段切除术的关键差异
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;16(23):3981. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233981.
2
ASO Author Reflections: Utility of Sublobar Resection for Small-Sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.ASO作者反思:亚肺叶切除术在小尺寸非小细胞肺癌中的应用价值
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):874-875. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16126-7. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Impact of Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.癌症炎症预后指数对非小细胞肺癌的预后影响
Lung. 2023 Dec;201(6):603-610. doi: 10.1007/s00408-023-00649-z. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
2
Wedge resection versus lobectomy in T1 lung cancer patients: a propensity matched analysis.楔形切除术与肺叶切除术治疗 T1 期肺癌患者的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Aug 24;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02303-4.
3
The Utility of SUVmax as an Adaptation Criterion for Limited Resection in Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
SUVmax 作为 IA 期非小细胞肺癌局限性切除适应标准的效用。
Oncology. 2023;101(8):473-480. doi: 10.1159/000530314. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
Adaptation criterion for segmentectomy in small-sized early stage non-small cell lung cancer.小体积早期非小细胞肺癌的肺段切除术适应证。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Nov;13(21):2985-2991. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14647. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
Operative Time is Associated With Postoperative Complications After Pulmonary Lobectomy.手术时间与肺叶切除术后并发症相关。
Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):e1259-e1266. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005696. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Interstitial lung disease and wedge resection are poor prognostic factors for non-small cell lung cancer.间质性肺疾病和楔形切除术是非小细胞肺癌的不良预后因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Apr;14(4):1052-1060. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1757.
7
Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.小型周围型非小细胞肺癌的肺段切除术与肺叶切除术比较(JCOG0802/WJOG4607L):一项多中心、开放标签、3期、随机、对照、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2022 Apr 23;399(10335):1607-1617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02333-3.
8
Interest of anatomical segmentectomy over lobectomy for lung cancer: a nationwide study.解剖性肺段切除术与肺叶切除术治疗肺癌的疗效比较:一项全国性研究。
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jun;13(6):3587-3596. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2203.
9
A single-arm study of sublobar resection for ground-glass opacity dominant peripheral lung cancer.亚肺叶切除术治疗以磨玻璃密度影为主要表现的周围型肺癌的单臂研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):289-301.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.146. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
10
Segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期非小细胞肺癌的肺段切除术或肺叶切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 1;57(6):1051-1060. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz339.