Motono Nozomu, Mizoguchi Takaki, Ishikawa Masahito, Iwai Shun, Iijima Yoshihito, Uramoto Hidetaka
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Ishikawa, Japan.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):811-822. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16027-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Although sublobar resection (wedge resection [Wed] or segmentectomy [Seg]) has become a standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, the impact of this procedure on the prognosis and postoperative complications in real-world clinical practice is unknown.
This study retrospectively analyzed risk factors for a poor prognosis and postoperative complications of 470 patients with clinical stage ≤ IA2 NSCLC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021.
Among the patients with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) higher than 0.5, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in the Wed group (72.1%) than in the Seg (85.8%) and Lob (86.8%) groups (p < 0.01), but the difference between the Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Among patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower, the 5-year RFS rate did not differ significantly among the three groups. Multivariable analysis of RFS showed that the prognosis was significantly worse in the Wed group than in the Lob group (hazard ratio, 2.83; p < 0.01), but the difference between the Wed and Seg groups or the between Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Multivariable analysis of postoperative complications showed a significantly lower risk in the Wed group than in the Seg group (odds ratio, 0.31; p < 0.01).
Seg could become the standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 NSCLC patients. Wed is suggested to be an option for patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower and has the advantage of avoiding postoperative complications.
尽管在日本,亚肺叶切除术(楔形切除术[Wed]或肺段切除术[Seg])已成为临床IA1期和IA2期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准手术方式,但在实际临床实践中,该手术对预后和术后并发症的影响尚不清楚。
本研究回顾性分析了2012年至2021年接受手术的470例临床分期≤IA2期NSCLC患者预后不良和术后并发症的危险因素。
在实变与肿瘤比值(CTR)高于0.5的患者中,楔形切除术组的5年无复发生存率(RFS)显著低于肺段切除术组(85.8%)和肺叶切除术组(86.8%)(72.1%)(p<0.01),但肺段切除术组和肺叶切除术组之间的差异不显著。在CTR为0.5或更低的患者中,三组之间的5年RFS率无显著差异。RFS的多变量分析显示,楔形切除术组的预后显著差于肺叶切除术组(风险比,2.83;p<0.01),但楔形切除术组与肺段切除术组之间或肺段切除术组与肺叶切除术组之间的差异不显著。术后并发症的多变量分析显示,楔形切除术组的风险显著低于肺段切除术组(比值比,0.31;p<0.01)。
肺段切除术可成为临床IA1期和IA2期NSCLC患者的标准手术方式。对于CTR为0.5或更低的患者,楔形切除术是一种选择,且具有避免术后并发症的优势。