Svendsen Kristian, Askar Mohsen, Umer Danial, Halvorsen Kjell H
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jul 23;15:100478. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100478. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Students in pharmacy are positive towards integrating artificial intelligence and ChatGPT into their practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct short-term learning effect of using Chat GPT by pharmacy students.
This was an experimental randomized study. Students were allocated into two groups; the intervention group ( = 15) used all study tools and ChatGPT, while the control group ( = 16) used all study tools, except ChatGPT. Differences between groups was measured by how well they performed on a knowledge test before and after a short study period.
No significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in level of competence in the pretest score ( ). There was also no significant effect of using ChatGPT, with a mean adjusted difference of 0.5 points on a 12-point scale. However there was a trend towards a higher proportion of ChatGPT participants having a large (at least four point) increase in score (4 out of 15) control group (1 out of 16).
There is a potential for positive effects of ChatGPT on learning outcomes in pharmacy students, however the current study was underpowered to measure a statistically significant effect of ChatGPT on short term learning.
药学专业的学生对将人工智能和ChatGPT融入他们的实践持积极态度。本研究的目的是调查药学专业学生使用ChatGPT的直接短期学习效果。
这是一项实验性随机研究。学生被分为两组;干预组(n = 15)使用所有学习工具和ChatGPT,而对照组(n = 16)使用除ChatGPT之外的所有学习工具。通过在短时间学习前后他们在知识测试中的表现来衡量两组之间的差异。
干预组和对照组在预测试分数的能力水平上没有发现显著差异(p值)。使用ChatGPT也没有显著效果,在12分制上平均调整差异为0.5分。然而,有一个趋势是,ChatGPT参与者中分数大幅提高(至少4分)的比例更高(15人中有4人),而对照组为(16人中有1人)。
ChatGPT对药学专业学生的学习成果有产生积极影响的潜力,然而目前的研究不足以衡量ChatGPT对短期学习的统计学显著效果。