Suppr超能文献

工具、威胁、导师、交流与趋势:大学生对ChatGPT的态度

Tool, Threat, Tutor, Talk, and Trend: College Students' Attitudes toward ChatGPT.

作者信息

Yu Sen-Chi, Huang Yueh-Min, Wu Ting-Ting

机构信息

Department of Counseling and Applied Psychology, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung 403, Taiwan.

Department of Engineering Science, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;14(9):755. doi: 10.3390/bs14090755.

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to investigate college students' attitudes toward ChatGPT and to understand whether gender makes any difference in their attitudes. We developed the ChatGPT attitude scale (CAS) and administrated it to a sample of 516 Taiwan college students. Through an exploratory factor analysis, the 5-T (Tool, Tutor, Talk, Trend, and Threat) model of CAS was extracted and validated via confirmatory factor analysis. The CAS exhibited good reliability and validity and can be used to explain ChatGPT attitudes. According to our findings, university students consider ChatGPT an important "Tool" in their daily life. Additionally, ChatGPT plays a significant "Tutor" role, assisting with language translation and knowledge learning. Besides its utilitarian functions, ChatGPT also serves as a "Talk" feature, offering interactive chat and emotional support. Currently, students also acknowledge ChatGPT as an important "Trend" of the times, but they are also deeply concerned about the potential "Threat" of content falsification and job displacement brought on by ChatGPT. In terms of gender differences, compared to females, males scored higher than females in the total scale and in the Tool, Tutor, and Trend subscales. However, there was no significant difference between males and females in the Talk and Threat subscales. This gender difference result differs from previous research on robots or social media.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查大学生对ChatGPT的态度,并了解性别在他们的态度上是否存在差异。我们编制了ChatGPT态度量表(CAS),并将其施测于516名台湾大学生样本。通过探索性因素分析,提取了CAS的5-T(工具、导师、交谈、趋势和威胁)模型,并通过验证性因素分析进行了验证。CAS表现出良好的信效度,可用于解释对ChatGPT的态度。根据我们的研究结果,大学生认为ChatGPT是他们日常生活中的重要“工具”。此外,ChatGPT还发挥着重要的“导师”作用,辅助语言翻译和知识学习。除了其功利性功能外,ChatGPT还具有“交谈”功能,提供互动聊天和情感支持。目前,学生们也认可ChatGPT是时代的重要“趋势”,但他们也深切关注ChatGPT带来的内容造假和工作岗位被取代的潜在“威胁”。在性别差异方面,与女性相比,男性在总量表以及工具、导师和趋势子量表上的得分高于女性。然而,男性和女性在交谈和威胁子量表上没有显著差异。这一性别差异结果与先前关于机器人或社交媒体的研究不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dd8/11429010/942b09f9ef57/behavsci-14-00755-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Tool, Threat, Tutor, Talk, and Trend: College Students' Attitudes toward ChatGPT.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;14(9):755. doi: 10.3390/bs14090755.
5
ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):e53032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53032. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Short-term learning effect of ChatGPT on pharmacy students' learning.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Jul 23;15:100478. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100478. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students' acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model.
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 26;14:1259531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Can ChatGPT Boost Students' Employment Confidence? A Pioneering Booster for Career Readiness.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;15(3):362. doi: 10.3390/bs15030362.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): a brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 24;14:1191628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628. eCollection 2023.
2
The More COVID-19 Information We Shared; the More Anxious We Got? The Associations Among Social Media Use, Anxiety, and Coping Strategies.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Dec;25(12):776-783. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0010. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
What influences attitudes about artificial intelligence adoption: Evidence from U.S. local officials.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0257732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257732. eCollection 2021.
4
Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale.
Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2020 Jan-Jul;1:100014. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014. Epub 2020 May 18.
5
Chatbot application in a 5th grade science course.
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2021;26(5):6241-6265. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10627-8. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Toward COVID-19 Information: Infodemic or Fear of Missing Out?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;8(4):550. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040550.
7
Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence.
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jun;64:277-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Medical students' attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1640-1646. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
10
Adolescents' perceptions toward the internet: a 4-T framework.
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Aug;7(4):458-63. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.458.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验