Faculty Training on Navigating Gender and Sex in Medical Education.

INTRODUCTION

Language that assumes gender and sex are binary and aligned is pervasive in medicine and is often used when teaching on physiology and pathology. Information presented through this lens oversimplifies disease mechanisms and poorly addresses the health of gender and sexually diverse (GSD) individuals. We developed a training session to help faculty reference gender and sex in a manner that would be accurate and inclusive of GSD health.

METHODS

The 1-hour session for undergraduate and graduate medical educators highlighted cisgender and binary biases in medical teachings and introduced a getting-to-the-root mindset that prioritized teaching the processes underlying differences in disease profiles among gender and sex subpopulations. The training consisted of 30 minutes of didactic teaching and 20 minutes of small-group discussion. Medical education faculty attended and self-reported knowledge and awareness before and after the training. Results were compared using paired tests. Expenses included fees for consultation and catering.

RESULTS

Forty faculty participated (pretraining survey = 36, posttraining survey = 21). After the training, there was a significant increase in self-reported awareness of the difference between gender and sex ( = .002), perceived relevance of gender to teachings ( = .04), and readiness to discuss physiological drivers of sex-linked disease ( = .005).

DISCUSSION

Participants reported increased understanding and consideration of gender and sex in medical education; feedback emphasized a desire for continued guidance. This easily adaptable session can provide an introduction to a series of medical teachings on gender and sex.