Suppr超能文献

共病性精神病中的种族和民族差异:一项基于人群的研究。

Racial and ethnic differences in comorbid psychosis: a population-based study.

作者信息

Sankoh Mariam, Clifford James, Peterson Roseann E, Prom-Wormley Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Integrative Life Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.

Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 29;15:1280253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1280253. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Differences in the prevalence of psychiatric conditions such as psychosis as well as patterns of comorbidity for psychosis have been reported between racial and ethnic groups. It is unclear whether those differences are consistent for comorbid psychosis.

METHODS

Self-reported diagnostic data from American adults ages 18-99 participating in the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES) (N ~ 11,844) were used to test the association between four racial and ethnic group categories (White, Asian, Hispanic, Black) and comorbid psychosis. Comorbid psychosis was measured as a 4-level categorical variable (No mental illness nor psychosis, Mental Illness, Psychosis only, comorbid psychosis (i.e., Psychosis + Mental Illness). Chi-square tests were used to determine significant differences in the prevalence of comorbid psychosis by race and ethnicity. A multinomial logistic regression was used to test the association between racial and ethnic classifications and comorbid psychosis after adjusting for common demographic characteristics (i.e., education, sex, income, and age).

RESULTS

Relative to White participants, Hispanic and Asian participants were less likely to be affected with comorbid psychosis. (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR = 0.32, CI = 0.22 - 0.47, p <0.0001, AOR = 0.66, CI = 0.48 - 0.92, p = 0.012). Relative to White participants there was not significant association for comorbid psychosis in Black participants (AOR = 0.91, CI = 0.70 - 1.20, p = 0.52) In contrast Hispanic and Black participants were more likely to report psychosis alone (AOR = 1.94, CI = 1.27-2.98, p = 0.002, AOR = 1.86, 1.24-2.82, p = 0.003) compared to White participants.

CONCLUSION

There were different patterns of associations by race and ethnicity for psychosis and comorbid psychosis. The lower prevalence of comorbid psychosis in non-White groups may be due to underdiagnosis or underreporting of other mental disorders.

摘要

引言

据报道,种族和族裔群体在精神病等精神疾病的患病率以及精神病的共病模式方面存在差异。尚不清楚这些差异在共病性精神病中是否一致。

方法

使用参与协作精神病流行病学调查(CPES)(N≈11844)的18 - 99岁美国成年人的自我报告诊断数据,来检验四个种族和族裔类别(白人、亚裔、西班牙裔、黑人)与共病性精神病之间的关联。共病性精神病被测量为一个四级分类变量(无精神疾病或精神病、精神疾病、仅精神病、共病性精神病(即精神病 + 精神疾病))。卡方检验用于确定按种族和族裔划分的共病性精神病患病率的显著差异。在调整常见人口统计学特征(即教育程度、性别、收入和年龄)后,使用多项逻辑回归来检验种族和族裔分类与共病性精神病之间的关联。

结果

与白人参与者相比,西班牙裔和亚裔参与者患共病性精神病的可能性较小。(调整后的优势比,AOR = 0.32,CI = 0.22 - 0.47,p <0.0001,AOR = 0.66,CI = 0.48 - 0.92,p = 0.012)。与白人参与者相比,黑人参与者中共病性精神病没有显著关联(AOR = 0.91,CI = 0.70 - 1.20,p = 0.52)。相比之下,与白人参与者相比,西班牙裔和黑人参与者单独报告患精神病的可能性更大(AOR = 1.94,CI = 1.27 - 2.98,p = 0.002,AOR = 1.86,1.24 - 2.82,p = 0.003)。

结论

精神病和共病性精神病在种族和族裔方面存在不同的关联模式。非白人群体中共病性精神病患病率较低可能是由于其他精神障碍的诊断不足或报告不足。

相似文献

1
Racial and ethnic differences in comorbid psychosis: a population-based study.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 29;15:1280253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1280253. eCollection 2024.
2
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Psychiatric and Medical Diagnoses Among Autistic Adults.
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Dec 1;4(4):290-305. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0083. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Young Women's Health-Promoting Strategies to Reduce Vulnerability to Sexually Transmitted Infections.
J Adolesc Health. 2017 May;60(5):556-562. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.024. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Inequalities in the Incidence of Psychotic Disorders Among Racial and Ethnic Groups.
Am J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 1;180(11):805-814. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20220917. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Association of Race and Ethnicity With Late-Life Depression Severity, Symptom Burden, and Care.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201606. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1606.
8
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Differences in Food Allergies in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18162.
10
Rethinking race/ethnicity, income, and childhood asthma: racial/ethnic disparities concentrated among the very poor.
Public Health Rep. 2005 Mar-Apr;120(2):109-16. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000203.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic sensitivity analysis: Adjusting for genetic confounding in epidemiological associations.
PLoS Genet. 2021 Jun 11;17(6):e1009590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009590. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Comorbidity in Schizophrenia: Conceptual Issues and Clinical Management.
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020 Oct;18(4):386-390. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200026. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Is the Black-White mental health paradox consistent across age, gender, and psychiatric disorders?
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Jan;26(1):196-204. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1855627. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Two-year diagnostic stability in a real-world sample of individuals with early psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;14(6):751-754. doi: 10.1111/eip.12930. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
6
Race, mental health, and the research gap.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 May;6(5):367-368. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30091-4.
7
A Naturalistic Study of Racial Disparities in Diagnoses at an Outpatient Behavioral Health Clinic.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Feb 1;70(2):130-134. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800223. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
Immigration and psychotic experiences in the United States: Another example of the epidemiological paradox?
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Oct 30;229(3):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Psychosis.
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015 Jun;21(3 Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry):715-36. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000466662.89908.e7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验