Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK.
Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London, UK.
Gerontologist. 2024 Nov 1;64(11). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae112.
English and Welsh laws require "contemporaneous" consent to sexual relations, often precluding "non-capacituos" people living with advanced dementia from these human interactions.
The views of people living with dementia, carers, professionals, and over-55s were explored on implications of current laws on sexuality in dementia. Thirty-five participants from England were recruited through purposive selective sampling. Audio-taped semistructured interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed with each stakeholder group coded separately.
Common themes across stakeholders were (i) law reform needed due to their hammer-like effect ignoring the individual; (ii) dissonant theme of needing the law for protection; (iii) negative impact of denied intimacy on individuals and partners; (iv) support for Advance Decisions on Intimacy with caveats; (v) less support for involvement of Court of Protection and Powers of Attorney; (vi) call for review of capacity concept with support for an assent model. People living with dementia described shame and stigma associated with policing of their sexuality and perception of being singled out for protection and intrusion into their lives. For informal carers (mostly wives), the theme of "what about me" emerged, demonstrating that for the long-term partnered, this is a couple's issue.
Practical implications of this study include need to address ageism and ableism; human rights education for society and professionals; starting point of presumed capacity for sexual relations with consensus on how and when this should be rebutted; and care homes' certification requirements should incorporate assessment of the relationship health of their residents.
英国和威尔士的法律要求性同意必须是“即时的”,这往往使患有晚期痴呆症且“无行为能力”的人无法进行这些人际交往。
本研究旨在探讨痴呆症患者、照护者、专业人士和 55 岁以上人群对现行法律在痴呆症患者性行为方面的影响的看法。通过有针对性的选择性抽样,在英格兰招募了 35 名参与者。对参与者进行了录音的半结构化访谈,对访谈内容进行了主题分析,并对每个利益相关者群体进行了单独编码。
不同利益相关者的共同主题包括:(i)需要进行法律改革,因为现有法律无视个体差异,具有强制性;(ii)需要法律保护的不和谐主题;(iii)性亲密关系被否认对个人和伴侣的负面影响;(iv)支持预先做出关于亲密关系的决定,但需谨慎处理;(v)对涉及保护法院和授权书的支持较少;(vi)呼吁对能力概念进行审查,并支持同意模式。痴呆症患者描述了他们的性行为受到监管所带来的羞耻感和耻辱感,以及他们被单独挑选出来进行保护和干涉生活的感觉。对于非正规照护者(大多为妻子),出现了“我怎么办”的主题,这表明对于长期伴侣来说,这是一个夫妻双方的问题。
本研究的实际意义包括需要解决年龄歧视和能力歧视问题;对社会和专业人士进行人权教育;以如何以及何时可以反驳这一假定为起点,对性关系的能力进行共识性预设;养老院的认证要求应纳入对居民关系健康的评估。