• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dementia and sexuality in long-term care: Incompatible bedfellows?痴呆症与长期护理中的性行为:水火不容吗?
Dementia (London). 2022 May;21(4):1077-1097. doi: 10.1177/14713012211056253. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
Sexuality and the Human Rights of Persons With Dementia.痴呆症患者的性与人权
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;29(10):1021-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 30.
3
Relational autonomy in action: Rethinking dementia and sexuality in care facilities.行动中的关系自主性:重新思考护理机构中的痴呆症和性行为。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Sep;26(6):1654-1664. doi: 10.1177/0969733018780527. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Intimacy between care home residents with dementia: Findings from a review of the literature.痴呆症护理院居民之间的亲密关系:文献综述结果
Dementia (London). 2019 Jan;18(1):94-107. doi: 10.1177/1471301216659771. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
The Law, Dementia, and Sexuality-Is the Law Striking the Right Balance?法律、痴呆症与性行为——法律是否达到了恰当的平衡?
Gerontologist. 2024 Nov 1;64(11). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae112.
6
Value pluralism about sexual intimacy in residential care.关于居住照料中性亲密关系的价值多元论。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 May;30(3):437-448. doi: 10.1177/09697330221136630. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
7
Nurses' experiences and reactions towards intimacy and sexuality expressions by nursing home residents: A qualitative study.护士对养老院居民表达亲密和性的体验和反应:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):836-849. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14680. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
8
Care Staff's Sense-making of Intimate and Sexual Expressions of People with Dementia in Dutch Nursing Homes.护理人员对荷兰养老院中痴呆症患者的亲密和性表达的意义建构。
Clin Gerontol. 2022 Jul-Sep;45(4):833-843. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.1928357. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
Citizenship, human rights, and dementia: Towards a new embodied relational ethic of sexuality.公民身份、人权与痴呆症:迈向一种新的具身化性取向关系伦理。
Dementia (London). 2016 May;15(3):315-29. doi: 10.1177/1471301216636258.
10
Advancing an Ethic of Embodied Relational Sexuality to Guide Decision-Making in Dementia Care.推进具身关系性伦理以指导痴呆症护理决策。
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):219-225. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw137.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers Related to the Identification and Satisfaction of the Sexual Needs of Nursing Homes' Residents: A Narrative Review.养老院居民性需求识别与满足的相关障碍:一项叙述性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 22;22(8):1163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081163.
2
Sexual Quality of Life of Seniors Living in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.居住在长期护理机构中的老年人的性生活质量:一项范围综述。
Int J Sex Health. 2025 Mar 6;37(2):263-283. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2025.2466637. eCollection 2025.
3
From 'support' to 'separate': residential aged care staff responses to an intimate relationship involving a resident with cognitive impairment.从“支持”到“分离”:老年护理院工作人员对涉及认知障碍居民的亲密关系的反应
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05865-1.
4
The Law, Dementia, and Sexuality-Is the Law Striking the Right Balance?法律、痴呆症与性行为——法律是否达到了恰当的平衡?
Gerontologist. 2024 Nov 1;64(11). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae112.

本文引用的文献

1
Sexuality and the Human Rights of Persons With Dementia.痴呆症患者的性与人权
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;29(10):1021-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
Not in the Brochure: and Residential Aged Care.宣传册未提及:以及老年住宅护理。
Sex Res Social Policy. 2022;19(2):588-598. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00573-y. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
3
Dementia, Treatment Decisions, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. A New Framework for Old Problems.痴呆症、治疗决策与《联合国残疾人权利公约》。解决老问题的新框架。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 9;11:571722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.571722. eCollection 2020.
4
Dementia, Sexuality, and the Law: The Case for Advance Decisions on Intimacy.痴呆症、性行为与法律:关于亲密关系预先决定的案例。
Gerontologist. 2021 Sep 13;61(7):1001-1007. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa139.
5
Regulating, fostering and preserving: the production of sexual normates through cognitive ableism and cognitive othering.规范、培养和保护:通过认知能力主义和认知他者化来生产性规范者。
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Oct;23(10):1421-1434. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1787519. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
Sexual Expression in Alberta's Continuing Care Homes: Capacity, Consent, and Co-decision-making.艾伯塔省持续护理院的性行为表达:能力、同意和共同决策。
Can J Aging. 2021 Mar;40(1):156-165. doi: 10.1017/S0714980819000813. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Love, Intimacy and Sexuality in Residential Dementia Care: A Client Perspective.住院痴呆症护理中的爱、亲密关系与性:患者视角
Clin Gerontol. 2021 May-Jun;44(3):288-298. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2019.1667468. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
A critical realist exploration of the vulnerability of staff to sexual harassment in residential long-term care.从批判现实主义视角探究长期居住型养老护理中员工易受性骚扰影响这一现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112356. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
9
Problematizing Sexual Harassment in Residential Long-Term Care: The Need for a More Ethical Prevention Strategy.论住宅长期护理中的性骚扰问题:更具伦理的预防策略的必要性。
Can J Aging. 2020 Mar;39(1):117-127. doi: 10.1017/S0714980819000199.
10
The "Violent Resident": A Critical Exploration of the Ethics of Resident-to-Resident Aggression.“暴力居民”:对居民间攻击行为的伦理探讨。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Jun;16(2):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09898-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

痴呆症与长期护理中的性行为:水火不容吗?

Dementia and sexuality in long-term care: Incompatible bedfellows?

机构信息

Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, 7961Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Dementia (London). 2022 May;21(4):1077-1097. doi: 10.1177/14713012211056253. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1177/14713012211056253
PMID:34904897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9189437/
Abstract

Despite the recognized benefits of sexual expression and its importance in the lives of people living with dementia, research demonstrates that there are multiple barriers to its positive expression (e.g., expression that is pleasurable and free of coercion, discrimination, and violence) in RLTC homes. These barriers constitute a form of discrimination based on age and ability, and violate the rights of persons living with dementia to dignity, autonomy, and participation in everyday life and society. Drawing on a human rights approach to dementia and sexual expression, we explored the experiences of diverse professionals, family members, and persons living with dementia with explicit attention to the ways in which macro-level dynamics are influencing the support, or lack thereof, for sexual expression at the micro level. Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted with 27 participants, and the collected data were analyzed thematically. While all participants acknowledged that intimacy and sexual expression of persons living with dementia should be supported, rarely is such expression supported in practice. Micro-level factors included negative attitudes of professionals toward sexual expression by persons living with dementia, their discomfort with facilitating intimacy and sexual expression in the context of their professional roles, their anxieties regarding potential negative reactions from family members, and concerns about sanctions for failing to prevent abuse. In our analysis, we importantly trace these micro-level factors to macro-level factors. The latter include the cultural stigma associated with dementia, ageism, ableism, and erotophobia, all of which are reproduced in, and reinforced by, professionals' education, as well as legal and professional standards that exclusively focus on managing and safeguarding residents from abuse. Our analysis demonstrates a complexity that has enormous potential to inform future research that is critically needed for the development of educational initiatives and to promote policy changes in this area.

摘要

尽管性表达被认为有很多好处,对痴呆症患者的生活也很重要,但研究表明,在长期护理机构中,其积极表达(例如,愉悦且无胁迫、歧视和暴力的表达)存在多种障碍。这些障碍构成了一种基于年龄和能力的歧视,侵犯了痴呆症患者的尊严、自主以及参与日常生活和社会的权利。我们借鉴了人权视角下的痴呆症和性表达,探讨了不同专业人员、家庭成员和痴呆症患者的体验,特别关注宏观层面的动态如何影响微观层面对性表达的支持或缺乏支持。我们对 27 名参与者进行了焦点小组和深入访谈,并对收集到的数据进行了主题分析。虽然所有参与者都承认应该支持痴呆症患者的亲密关系和性表达,但实际上很少有这种表达得到支持。微观层面的因素包括专业人士对痴呆症患者性表达的负面态度、他们在专业角色背景下对促进亲密关系和性表达的不自在、对家庭成员可能产生负面反应的担忧,以及对未能防止虐待的制裁的担忧。在我们的分析中,我们重要地将这些微观层面的因素追溯到宏观层面的因素。后者包括与痴呆症相关的文化耻辱、年龄歧视、能力歧视和厌恶色情,所有这些都在专业人员的教育中得到体现,并得到强化,以及专门侧重于管理和保护居民免受虐待的法律和专业标准。我们的分析表明了一种复杂性,这种复杂性具有巨大的潜力,可以为未来的研究提供信息,而这些研究对于制定教育计划和推动这一领域的政策变革是非常必要的。