Suppr超能文献

钴:一项使用安慰剂和外部对照的奥贝胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎的验证性试验。

COBALT: A Confirmatory Trial of Obeticholic Acid in Primary Biliary Cholangitis With Placebo and External Controls.

作者信息

Kowdley Kris V, Hirschfield Gideon M, Coombs Charles, Malecha Elizabeth S, Bessonova Leona, Li Jing, Rathnayaka Nuvan, Mells George, Jones David E, Trivedi Palak J, Hansen Bettina E, Smith Rachel, Wason James, Hiu Shaun, Kareithi Dorcas N, Mason Andrew L, Bowlus Christopher L, Muller Kate, Carbone Marco, Berenguer Marina, Milkiewicz Piotr, Adekunle Femi, Villamil Alejandra

机构信息

Liver Institute Northwest and Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 1;120(2):390-400. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003029. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obeticholic acid (OCA) treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) was conditionally approved in the phase 3 POISE trial. The COBALT confirmatory trial assessed whether clinical outcomes in patients with PBC improve with OCA therapy.

METHODS

Patients randomized to OCA (5-10 mg) were compared with placebo (randomized controlled trial [RCT]) or external control (EC). The primary composite endpoint was time to death, liver transplant, model for end-stage liver disease score ≥15, uncontrolled ascites, or hospitalization for hepatic decompensation. A prespecified propensity score-weighted EC group was derived from a US healthcare claims database.

RESULTS

In the RCT, the primary endpoint occurred in 28.6% of OCA (n = 168) and 28.9% of placebo patients (n = 166; intent-to-treat analysis hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.68-1.51), but functional unblinding and crossover to commercial therapy occurred, especially in the placebo arm. Correcting for these using inverse probability of censoring weighting and as-treated analyses shifted the HR to favor OCA. In the EC (n = 1,051), the weighted primary endpoint occurred in 10.1% of OCA and 21.5% of non-OCA patients (HR = 0.39; 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.69; P = 0.001). No new safety signals were identified in the RCT.

DISCUSSION

Functional unblinding and treatment crossover, particularly in the placebo arm, confounded the intent-to-treat estimate of outcomes associated with OCA in the RCT. Comparison with the real-world EC showed that OCA treatment significantly reduced the risk of negative clinical outcomes. These analyses demonstrate the value of EC data in confirmatory trials and suggest that treatment with OCA improves clinical outcomes in patients with PBC.

摘要

引言

在3期POISE试验中,奥贝胆酸(OCA)治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)获得有条件批准。COBALT确证性试验评估了PBC患者接受OCA治疗后临床结局是否得到改善。

方法

将随机分配至OCA组(5 - 10毫克)的患者与安慰剂组(随机对照试验[RCT])或外部对照组(EC)进行比较。主要复合终点为死亡、肝移植、终末期肝病模型评分≥15、无法控制的腹水或因肝失代偿住院的时间。一个预先设定的倾向评分加权EC组来自美国医疗保健索赔数据库。

结果

在RCT中,主要终点在28.6%的OCA组患者(n = 168)和28.9%的安慰剂组患者(n = 166)中出现(意向性分析风险比[HR] = 1.01,95%置信区间 = 0.68 - 1.51),但出现了功能揭盲以及交叉接受商业治疗的情况,尤其是在安慰剂组。使用删失加权的逆概率和实际治疗分析对这些情况进行校正后,HR向有利于OCA的方向转变。在EC组(n = 1051)中,加权主要终点在10.1%的OCA组患者和21.5%的非OCA组患者中出现(HR = 0.39;95%置信区间 = 0.22 - 0.69;P = 0.001)。在RCT中未发现新的安全信号。

讨论

功能揭盲和治疗交叉,尤其是在安慰剂组,混淆了RCT中与OCA相关结局的意向性分析估计值。与真实世界的EC组比较显示,OCA治疗显著降低了不良临床结局的风险。这些分析证明了EC数据在确证性试验中的价值,并表明OCA治疗可改善PBC患者的临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92fa/11774195/85288a691621/acg-120-390-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验