Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Deptartment of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 14;11:e56045. doi: 10.2196/56045.
The rising prevalence of mental health issues in children, adolescents, and young adults has become an escalating public health issue, impacting approximately 10%-20% of young people on a global scale. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs) can act as powerful mental health promotion tools to reach wide-ranging audiences that might otherwise be challenging to access. This increased access would enable prevention of mental disorders and promotion of widespread well-being by enhancing self-efficacy, thereby supporting the achievement of tangible objectives.
We aimed to conduct a comprehensive synthesis of all randomized controlled trials and controlled trials involving children, adolescents, and young adults, encompassing both clinical and nonclinical populations, to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of digital PPIs in this age group.
After a literature search in 9 electronic databases until January 12, 2023, and gray literature until April 2023, we carried out a systematic review of 35 articles, of which 18 (51%) provided data for the meta-analysis. We included randomized controlled trials and controlled trials mainly based on web-based, digital, or smartphone-based interventions using a positive psychology framework as the main component. Studies included participants with a mean age of <35 years. Outcomes of PPIs were classified into indicators of well-being (compassion, life satisfaction, optimism, happiness, resilience, emotion regulation and emotion awareness, hope, mindfulness, purpose, quality of life, gratitude, empathy, forgiveness, motivation, and kindness) and ill-being (depression, anxiety, stress, loneliness, and burnout). PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for the selection of studies and data extraction. Quality assessment was performed following the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines.
For well-being outcomes, meta-analytic results showed that PPIs augmented the feeling of purpose, gratitude, and hope (Hedges g=0.555), compassion (Hedges g=0.447), positive coping behaviors (Hedges g=0.421), body image-related outcomes (Hedges g=0.238), and positive mindset predisposition (Hedges g=0.304). For ill-being outcomes, PPIs reduced cognitive biases (Hedges g=-0.637), negative emotions and mood (Hedges g=-0.369), and stress levels (Hedges g=-0.342). Of note, larger effect sizes were found when a waiting list control group was considered versus a digital control group. A funnel plot showed no publication bias. Meta-regression analyses showed that PPIs tended to show a larger effect size on well-being outcomes in studies including young adults, whereas no specific effect was found for ill-being outcomes.
Revised evidence suggests that PPIs benefit young people's well-being and mitigate ill-being symptoms. Digital platforms offer a unique way to address their mental health challenges, although not without limitations. Future research should explore how they work for the needs of the young population and further examine what specific PPIs or combination of interventions is most beneficial with respect to other digital control groups.
PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42023420092; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=420092.
儿童、青少年和青年心理健康问题的患病率不断上升,已成为日益严重的公共卫生问题,在全球范围内约有 10%-20%的年轻人受到影响。积极心理学干预(PPIs)可以作为强大的心理健康促进工具,覆盖更广泛的受众,这些受众可能难以接触。这种增加的可及性将通过增强自我效能感来预防精神障碍和促进广泛的幸福感,从而支持实现切实目标。
我们旨在对所有涉及儿童、青少年和青年的随机对照试验和对照试验进行综合综合分析,包括临床和非临床人群,以全面评估数字 PPIs 在该年龄组中的有效性。
在 2023 年 1 月 12 日之前对 9 个电子数据库和 2023 年 4 月的灰色文献进行文献检索后,我们对 35 篇文章进行了系统评价,其中 18 篇(51%)提供了元分析数据。我们纳入了主要基于网络、数字或智能手机的干预措施,采用积极心理学框架作为主要组成部分的随机对照试验和对照试验。研究包括平均年龄<35 岁的参与者。PPIs 的结果被分类为幸福感指标(同情、生活满意度、乐观、幸福、适应力、情绪调节和情绪意识、希望、正念、目的、生活质量、感恩、同理心、宽恕、动机和善良)和不适症状指标(抑郁、焦虑、压力、孤独和倦怠)。采用 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南选择研究和提取数据。按照 CONSORT(临床试验报告统一标准)指南进行质量评估。
对于幸福感结果,元分析结果表明,PPIs 增强了目标感、感恩和希望(Hedges g=0.555)、同情心(Hedges g=0.447)、积极应对行为(Hedges g=0.421)、与身体形象相关的结果(Hedges g=0.238)和积极心态倾向(Hedges g=0.304)。对于不适症状结果,PPIs 降低了认知偏差(Hedges g=-0.637)、负性情绪和情绪(Hedges g=-0.369)以及压力水平(Hedges g=-0.342)。值得注意的是,与数字对照组相比,当考虑等待名单对照组时,发现更大的效应量。漏斗图显示无发表偏倚。元回归分析表明,PPIs 对包括年轻人在内的研究中的幸福感结果显示出更大的影响,而对不适症状结果则没有特定的影响。
修订后的证据表明,PPIs 有益于年轻人的幸福感并减轻不适症状。数字平台为解决他们的心理健康挑战提供了一种独特的方式,尽管并非没有局限性。未来的研究应探讨它们如何满足年轻人的需求,并进一步研究哪些特定的 PPIs 或干预组合对其他数字对照组最有益。
PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心 CRD42023420092;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=420092。