Suppr超能文献

非侵入性背外侧前额叶皮层电刺激的镇痛作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Analgesia of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Medical Rehabilitation Center, Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2024 Oct;185:111868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111868. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is implicated in pain modulation, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for pain relief. However, studies on transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) over the DLPFC yielded diverse results, likely due to differences in stimulation protocols or pain assessment methods. This study aims to evaluate the analgesic effects of DLPFC-tES using a meta-analytical approach.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 29 studies involving 785 participants was conducted. The effects of genuine and sham DLPFC-tES on pain perception were examined in healthy individuals and patients with clinical pain. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of stimulation parameters and pain modalities.

RESULTS

DLPFC-tES did not significantly affect pain outcomes in healthy populations but showed promise in reducing pain-intensity ratings in patients with clinical pain (Hedges' g = -0.78, 95% CI = [-1.33, -0.24], p = 0.005). Electrode placement significantly influenced the analgesic effect, with better results observed when the anode was at F3 and the cathode at F4.

CONCLUSIONS

DLPFC-tES holds potential as a cost-effective pain management option, particularly for clinical populations. Optimizing electrode placement, especially with an symmetrical configuration, may enhance therapeutic efficacy. These findings underscore the promise of DLPFC-tES for alleviating perceived pain intensity in clinical settings, emphasizing the importance of electrode placement optimization.

摘要

目的

背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)参与疼痛调节,表明其作为缓解疼痛的治疗靶点具有潜力。然而,关于 DLPFC 经颅电刺激(tES)的研究结果存在差异,这可能是由于刺激方案或疼痛评估方法的不同。本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估 DLPFC-tES 的镇痛效果。

方法

对 29 项涉及 785 名参与者的研究进行荟萃分析。研究考察了真刺激和假刺激 DLPFC-tES 对健康个体和临床疼痛患者的疼痛感知的影响。亚组分析探讨了刺激参数和疼痛模式的影响。

结果

DLPFC-tES 并未显著影响健康人群的疼痛结果,但在减轻临床疼痛患者的疼痛强度评分方面显示出一定的潜力(Hedges' g=-0.78,95%CI=[-1.33,-0.24],p=0.005)。电极放置位置对镇痛效果有显著影响,当阳极位于 F3,阴极位于 F4 时,效果更好。

结论

DLPFC-tES 作为一种具有成本效益的疼痛管理选择具有潜力,特别是对临床人群。优化电极放置位置,特别是采用对称配置,可能会增强治疗效果。这些发现凸显了 DLPFC-tES 在临床环境中减轻感知疼痛强度的潜力,强调了优化电极放置位置的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验