• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非侵入性背外侧前额叶皮层电刺激的镇痛作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Analgesia of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Medical Rehabilitation Center, Shenzhen Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2024 Oct;185:111868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111868. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111868
PMID:39142194
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is implicated in pain modulation, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target for pain relief. However, studies on transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) over the DLPFC yielded diverse results, likely due to differences in stimulation protocols or pain assessment methods. This study aims to evaluate the analgesic effects of DLPFC-tES using a meta-analytical approach.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 29 studies involving 785 participants was conducted. The effects of genuine and sham DLPFC-tES on pain perception were examined in healthy individuals and patients with clinical pain. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of stimulation parameters and pain modalities.

RESULTS

DLPFC-tES did not significantly affect pain outcomes in healthy populations but showed promise in reducing pain-intensity ratings in patients with clinical pain (Hedges' g = -0.78, 95% CI = [-1.33, -0.24], p = 0.005). Electrode placement significantly influenced the analgesic effect, with better results observed when the anode was at F3 and the cathode at F4.

CONCLUSIONS

DLPFC-tES holds potential as a cost-effective pain management option, particularly for clinical populations. Optimizing electrode placement, especially with an symmetrical configuration, may enhance therapeutic efficacy. These findings underscore the promise of DLPFC-tES for alleviating perceived pain intensity in clinical settings, emphasizing the importance of electrode placement optimization.

摘要

目的

背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)参与疼痛调节,表明其作为缓解疼痛的治疗靶点具有潜力。然而,关于 DLPFC 经颅电刺激(tES)的研究结果存在差异,这可能是由于刺激方案或疼痛评估方法的不同。本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估 DLPFC-tES 的镇痛效果。

方法

对 29 项涉及 785 名参与者的研究进行荟萃分析。研究考察了真刺激和假刺激 DLPFC-tES 对健康个体和临床疼痛患者的疼痛感知的影响。亚组分析探讨了刺激参数和疼痛模式的影响。

结果

DLPFC-tES 并未显著影响健康人群的疼痛结果,但在减轻临床疼痛患者的疼痛强度评分方面显示出一定的潜力(Hedges' g=-0.78,95%CI=[-1.33,-0.24],p=0.005)。电极放置位置对镇痛效果有显著影响,当阳极位于 F3,阴极位于 F4 时,效果更好。

结论

DLPFC-tES 作为一种具有成本效益的疼痛管理选择具有潜力,特别是对临床人群。优化电极放置位置,特别是采用对称配置,可能会增强治疗效果。这些发现凸显了 DLPFC-tES 在临床环境中减轻感知疼痛强度的潜力,强调了优化电极放置位置的重要性。

相似文献

1
Analgesia of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性背外侧前额叶皮层电刺激的镇痛作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychosom Res. 2024 Oct;185:111868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111868. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3(3):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4.
3
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.用于慢性疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4(4):CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain, Fatigue, and Sleep Quality in Fibromyalgia. A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis.非侵入性脑刺激治疗纤维肌痛疼痛、疲劳和睡眠质量的比较效果:一项网状Meta分析的系统评价
Clin J Pain. 2025 May 1;41(5):e1282. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001282.
5
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on craving and negative emotion regulation in individuals at risk for problematic pornography use: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study.经颅直流电刺激右侧背外侧前额叶皮质对有问题的色情制品使用风险个体的渴望及负性情绪调节的影响:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Apr 15;14(2):1064-1078. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00030. Print 2025 Jul 2.
6
Revisiting the effects of rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on pain: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.重新审视重复经颅磁刺激背外侧前额叶皮质对疼痛的影响:一项最新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Stimul. 2024 Jul-Aug;17(4):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
Interventions for the management of abdominal pain in Crohn's disease and inflammatory bowel disease.干预措施用于克罗恩病和炎症性肠病的腹痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):CD013531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013531.pub2.
8
High-frequency rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on chronic and provoked pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高频 rTMS 经颅磁刺激治疗慢性和诱发性疼痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Brain Stimul. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):1135-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
9
Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Placebo for Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭式经颅直流电刺激与安慰剂治疗纤维肌痛:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2514262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.14262.
10
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语症患者语言和交流能力的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Preemptive transcranial direct current stimulation mitigates susceptibility to persistent pain.预防性经颅直流电刺激可减轻对持续性疼痛的易感性。
Commun Biol. 2025 Jun 5;8(1):865. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08304-4.