Centre for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; Institutes of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments, Hangzhou, China.
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brain Stimul. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):1135-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
High-frequency rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has demonstrated mixed effects on chronic and provoked pain.
OBJECTIVES/METHODS: In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to characterise the potential analgesic effects of high-frequency rTMS over the DLPFC on both chronic and provoked pain.
A total of 626 studies were identified in a systematic search. Twenty-six eligible studies were included for the quantitative review, among which 17 modulated chronic pain and the remaining investigated the influence on provoked pain. The left side DLPFC was uniformly targeted in the chronic pain studies. While our data identified no overall effect of TMS across chronic pain conditions, there was a significant short-term analgesia in neuropathic pain conditions only (SMD = -0.87). In terms of long-lasting analgesia, there was an overall pain reduction in the midterm (SMD = -0.53, 24.6 days average) and long term (SMD = -0.63, 3 months average) post DLPFC stimulation, although these effects were not observed within specific chronic pain conditions. Surprisingly, the number of sessions was demonstrated to have no impact on rTMS analgesia. In the analysis of provoked pain, our data also indicated a significant analgesic effect following HF-rTMS over the DLPFC (SMD = -0.73). Importantly, we identified a publication bias in the studies of provoked pain but not for chronic pain conditions.
Overall, our findings support that HF-DLPFC stimulation is able to induce an analgesic effect in chronic pain and in response to provoked pain. These results highlight the potential of DLPFC-rTMS in the management of certain chronic pain conditions and future directions are discussed to enhance the potential long-term analgesic effects.
高频 rTMS 对背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的刺激对慢性和诱发疼痛的影响不一。
目的/方法:本研究通过荟萃分析,研究高频 rTMS 对 DLPFC 刺激对慢性和诱发疼痛的潜在镇痛作用。
系统搜索共确定了 626 项研究。26 项符合条件的研究被纳入定量综述,其中 17 项研究调节了慢性疼痛,其余研究则研究了对诱发疼痛的影响。慢性疼痛研究中统一针对左侧 DLPFC。虽然我们的数据没有发现 TMS 对慢性疼痛状态的总体影响,但在神经病理性疼痛状态下有明显的短期镇痛作用(SMD=-0.87)。在长期镇痛方面,在中期(SMD=-0.53,平均 24.6 天)和长期(SMD=-0.63,平均 3 个月)刺激 DLPFC 后,总体疼痛减轻,尽管这些效果在特定的慢性疼痛状态下并未观察到。令人惊讶的是,刺激次数并没有影响 rTMS 的镇痛作用。在诱发疼痛的分析中,我们的数据还表明,高频 rTMS 对 DLPFC 的刺激具有显著的镇痛作用(SMD=-0.73)。重要的是,我们发现诱发疼痛研究存在发表偏倚,但在慢性疼痛研究中没有发现。
总的来说,我们的研究结果支持高频 DLPFC 刺激能够在慢性疼痛和诱发疼痛时产生镇痛作用。这些结果突出了 DLPFC-rTMS 在某些慢性疼痛疾病管理中的潜力,并讨论了未来的方向以增强潜在的长期镇痛效果。