Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药联用治疗精神分裂症谱系障碍的疗效和耐受性。一项个体患者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and tolerability of antipsychotic polypharmacy for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

机构信息

Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Expertise Center for Depression, Nijmeegsebaan 61, 6525 DX Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2024 Oct;272:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.07.035. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

DESIGN

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects.

RESULTS

We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects.

摘要

背景

抗精神病药联合用药(APP)常用于精神分裂症谱系障碍。尽管疗效不一致,但 APP 可能对某些精神病患者亚群有益。本项对个体患者数据的荟萃分析旨在调查 APP 在精神分裂症谱系障碍成年患者中的疗效和耐受性的调节因素。

设计

我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库,截至 2022 年 9 月 1 日,以比较 APP 与抗精神病药单药治疗的随机对照试验。我们使用(广义)线性混合效应模型,对患者水平的调节因素采用一阶段方法,对研究水平的调节因素采用两阶段方法来估计疗效。主要结局是治疗反应,定义为阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分降低 25%或更多。次要结局是研究停药和 PANSS 总分及其阳性和阴性症状子量表评分、临床总体印象量表(CGI)和不良反应从基线的变化。

结果

我们从 10 项研究(602 例患者;所有可能患者的 31%)中获得了个体患者数据,并将 599 例患者纳入分析。较高的基线 PANSS 总分增加了 APP 反应的可能性(OR=1.41,95%CI 1.02;1.94,p=0.037 每增加 10 分基线 PANSS 总分),主要是由基线阳性症状驱动的。PANSS 阳性症状子量表和 CGI 严重程度量表的变化也是如此。当第一代和第二代抗精神病药同时处方时,锥体外系副作用显著增加。两种治疗组的停药率相当。

结论

APP 对基线 PANSS 总分较高且主要为阳性症状的严重精神病患者有效。这种效果必须与潜在的不良反应权衡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验