The role of generative language systems in increasing patient awareness of colon cancer screening.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer) in answering patients' questions about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, with the ultimate goal of enhancing patients' awareness and adherence to national screening programs.

METHODS

15 questions on CRC screening were posed to ChatGPT4. The answers were rated by 20 gastroenterology experts and 20 nonexperts in three domains (accuracy, completeness, and comprehensibility), and by 100 patients in three dichotomic domains (completeness, comprehensibility, and trustability).

RESULTS

According to expert rating, the mean (SD) accuracy score was 4.8 (1.1), on a scale ranging from 1 to 6. The mean (SD) scores for completeness and comprehensibility were 2.1 (0.7) and 2.8 (0.4), respectively, on scales ranging from 1 to 3. Overall, the mean (SD) accuracy (4.8 [1.1] vs. 5.6 [0.7];  < 0.001) and completeness scores (2.1 [0.7] vs. 2.7 [0.4];  < 0.001) were significantly lower for the experts than for the nonexperts, while comprehensibility was comparable among the two groups (2.8 [0.4] vs. 2.8 [0.3];  = 0.55). Patients rated all questions as complete, comprehensible, and trustable in between 97 % and 100 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT shows good performance, with the potential to enhance awareness about CRC and improve screening outcomes. Generative language systems may be further improved after proper training in accordance with scientific evidence and current guidelines.