NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Popul Health Manag. 2024 Jun;27(5):338-344. doi: 10.1089/pop.2024.0097. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
The association between depression and ambulatory care utilization is unclear. The authors sought to determine the association between untreated depression and ambulatory care utilization, including the extent to which care is fragmented, or spread across providers. The authors conducted a longitudinal study using data from the nationwide REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study linked to Medicare fee-for-service claims ( = 1412). They categorized participants into three study groups, based on self-reported depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score ≥ 4) and a medication inventory for antidepressants: Symptomatic Untreated (SU), Symptomatic Treated (ST), and Asymptomatic Treated (AT). The authors used descriptive statistics to characterize ambulatory care patterns by study group. They determined the association between the study group and fragmentation score (with high fragmentation defined as a reversed Bice-Boxerman Index ≥ 0.85) using multivariable logistic regression. All groups had similar numbers of primary care visits, but the SU group had the fewest specialist visits. The SU group had the lowest proportion of participants who received care from a psychiatrist (3.4% vs. 10.7% for ST and 11.9% for AT, pairwise -values < 0.001). The SU group was the least likely to have highly fragmented care (adjusted odds ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.48, 0.95, compared with the ST group). These results suggest that older adults with untreated depression are not engaged in excess care-seeking behaviors. Rather, the results suggest undertreatment of depression in primary care and underutilization of psychiatric care.
抑郁症与门诊护理利用之间的关系尚不清楚。作者旨在确定未治疗的抑郁症与门诊护理利用之间的关联,包括护理分散或分布在多个提供者的程度。作者使用来自全国范围的地理和种族差异中风研究(REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study)的数据进行了一项纵向研究,该研究与医疗保险按服务收费(= 1412)相关联。他们根据自我报告的抑郁症状(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评分≥4)和抗抑郁药用药清单,将参与者分为三组:有症状未治疗(Symptomatic Untreated,SU)、有症状治疗(Symptomatic Treated,ST)和无症状治疗(Asymptomatic Treated,AT)。作者使用描述性统计方法按研究组描述门诊护理模式。他们使用多变量逻辑回归确定研究组与碎片化评分之间的关联(高碎片化定义为反向 Bice-Boxerman 指数≥0.85)。所有组的初级保健就诊次数相似,但 SU 组的专科就诊次数最少。SU 组接受精神科医生治疗的参与者比例最低(3.4%比 ST 组的 10.7%和 AT 组的 11.9%,两两比较值<0.001)。SU 组最不可能接受高度碎片化的护理(调整后的优势比 0.68;95%置信区间 0.48,0.95,与 ST 组相比)。这些结果表明,未治疗的抑郁症老年患者并没有过度寻求护理。相反,结果表明初级保健中对抑郁症的治疗不足,以及对精神科护理的利用不足。