Appleton Katherine M, Sallis Hannah M, Perry Rachel, Ness Andrew R, Churchill Rachel
Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole House, Fern Barrow, Poole, UK, BH12 5BB.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 5;2015(11):CD004692. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004692.pub4.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly debilitating, difficult to treat, has a high rate of recurrence, and negatively impacts the individual and society as a whole. One emerging potential treatment for MDD is n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3PUFAs), also known as omega-3 oils, naturally found in fatty fish, some other seafood, and some nuts and seeds. Various lines of evidence suggest a role for n-3PUFAs in MDD, but the evidence is far from conclusive. Reviews and meta-analyses clearly demonstrate heterogeneity between studies. Investigations of heterogeneity suggest differential effects of n-3PUFAs, depending on severity of depressive symptoms, where no effects of n-3PUFAs are found in studies of individuals with mild depressive symptomology, but possible benefit may be suggested in studies of individuals with more severe depressive symptomology.
To assess the effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (also known as omega-3 fatty acids) versus a comparator (e.g. placebo, anti-depressant treatment, standard care, no treatment, wait-list control) for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults.
We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialised Registers (CCDANCTR) and International Trial Registries over all years to May 2015. We searched the database CINAHL over all years of records to September 2013.
We included studies in the review if they: were a randomised controlled trial; provided n-3PUFAs as an intervention; used a comparator; measured depressive symptomology as an outcome; and were conducted in adults with MDD. Primary outcomes were depressive symptomology (continuous data collected using a validated rating scale) and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptomology (dichotomous data on remission and response), quality of life, and failure to complete studies.
We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.
We found 26 relevant studies: 25 studies involving a total of 1438 participants investigated the impact of n-3PUFA supplementation compared to placebo, and one study involving 40 participants investigated the impact of n-3PUFA supplementation compared to antidepressant treatment.For the placebo comparison, n-3PUFA supplementation results in a small to modest benefit for depressive symptomology, compared to placebo: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.32 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12 to -0.52; 25 studies, 1373 participants, very low quality evidence), but this effect is unlikely to be clinically meaningful (an SMD of 0.32 represents a difference between groups in scores on the HDRS (17-item) of approximately 2.2 points (95% CI 0.8 to 3.6)). The confidence intervals include both a possible clinically important effect and a possible negligible effect, and there is considerable heterogeneity between the studies. Although the numbers of individuals experiencing adverse events were similar in intervention and placebo groups (odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.62; 19 studies, 1207 participants; very low-quality evidence), the confidence intervals include a significant increase in adverse events with n-3PUFAs as well as a small possible decrease. Rates of remission and response, quality of life, and rates of failure to complete studies were also similar between groups, but confidence intervals are again wide.The evidence on which these results are based is very limited. All studies contributing to our analyses were of direct relevance to our research question, but we rated the quality of the evidence for all outcomes as low to very low. The number of studies and number of participants contributing to all analyses were low, and the majority of studies were small and judged to be at high risk of bias on several measures. Our analyses were also likely to be highly influenced by three large trials. Although we judge these trials to be at low risk of bias, they contribute 26.9% to 82% of data. Our effect size estimates are also imprecise. Funnel plot asymmetry and sensitivity analyses (using fixed-effect models, and only studies judged to be at low risk of selection bias, performance bias or attrition bias) also suggest a likely bias towards a positive finding for n-3PUFAs. There was substantial heterogeneity in analyses of our primary outcome of depressive symptomology. This heterogeneity was not explained by the presence or absence of comorbidities or by the presence or absence of adjunctive therapy.Only one study was available for the antidepressant comparison, involving 40 participants. This study found no differences between treatment with n-3PUFAs and treatment with antidepressants in depressive symptomology (mean difference (MD) -0.70 (95% CI -5.88 to 4.48)), rates of response to treatment or failure to complete. Adverse events were not reported in a manner suitable for analysis, and rates of depression remission and quality of life were not reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At present, we do not have sufficient high quality evidence to determine the effects of n-3PUFAs as a treatment for MDD. Our primary analyses suggest a small-to-modest, non-clinically beneficial effect of n-3PUFAs on depressive symptomology compared to placebo; however the estimate is imprecise, and we judged the quality of the evidence on which this result is based to be low/very low. Sensitivity analyses, funnel plot inspection and comparison of our results with those of large well-conducted trials also suggest that this effect estimate is likely to be biased towards a positive finding for n-3PUFAs, and that the true effect is likely to be smaller. Our data, however, also suggest similar rates of adverse events and numbers failing to complete trials in n-3PUFA and placebo groups, but again our estimates are very imprecise. The one study that directly compares n-3PUFAs and antidepressants in our review finds comparable benefit. More evidence, and more complete evidence, are required, particularly regarding both the potential positive and negative effects of n-3PUFAs for MDD.
重度抑郁症(MDD)极具致残性,难以治疗,复发率高,对个人乃至整个社会都有负面影响。一种新兴的MDD潜在治疗方法是n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(n-3PUFAs),也称为ω-3油,天然存在于多脂鱼类、其他一些海鲜以及一些坚果和种子中。各种证据表明n-3PUFAs在MDD中发挥作用,但证据远非确凿。综述和荟萃分析清楚地表明各研究之间存在异质性。对异质性的调查表明,n-3PUFAs的效果存在差异,这取决于抑郁症状的严重程度,在轻度抑郁症状个体的研究中未发现n-3PUFAs的效果,但在重度抑郁症状个体的研究中可能显示出益处。
评估n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(也称为ω-3脂肪酸)与对照物(如安慰剂、抗抑郁治疗、标准护理、不治疗、等待名单对照)相比,对成人重度抑郁症(MDD)的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane抑郁、焦虑和神经症综述小组的专业注册库(CCDANCTR)以及截至2015年5月的所有年份的国际试验注册库。我们检索了CINAHL数据库截至2013年9月的所有年份记录。
如果研究符合以下条件,我们将其纳入综述:是随机对照试验;提供n-3PUFAs作为干预措施;使用对照物;将抑郁症状作为结局指标进行测量;并且在患有MDD的成人中进行。主要结局是抑郁症状(使用经过验证的评分量表收集的连续数据)和不良事件。次要结局是抑郁症状(关于缓解和反应的二分数据)、生活质量以及研究未完成情况。
我们采用了Cochrane预期的标准方法程序。
我们找到了26项相关研究:25项研究共涉及1438名参与者,调查了补充n-3PUFA与安慰剂相比的影响,1项研究涉及40名参与者,调查了补充n-3PUFA与抗抑郁治疗相比的影响。对于与安慰剂的比较,与安慰剂相比,补充n-3PUFA对抑郁症状有小到中等程度的益处:标准化均数差(SMD)为-0.32(95%置信区间(CI)-0.12至-0.52;25项研究,1373名参与者,极低质量证据),但这种效果不太可能具有临床意义(SMD为0.32表示两组在17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)得分上的差异约为2.2分(95%CI 0.8至3.6))。置信区间既包括可能具有临床重要性的效果,也包括可能可忽略不计的效果,并且各研究之间存在相当大的异质性。尽管干预组和安慰剂组中出现不良事件的个体数量相似(优势比(OR)为1.24,95%CI 0.95至1.62;19项研究,1207名参与者;极低质量证据),但置信区间包括n-3PUFAs导致不良事件显著增加以及可能有小幅减少的情况。两组之间的缓解率、反应率、生活质量以及研究未完成率也相似,但置信区间同样很宽。这些结果所依据的证据非常有限。所有纳入我们分析的研究都与我们的研究问题直接相关,但我们将所有结局的证据质量评为低到极低。纳入所有分析的研究数量和参与者数量都很少,并且大多数研究规模较小,在多项指标上被判定存在高偏倚风险。我们的分析也可能受到三项大型试验的高度影响。尽管我们认为这些试验的偏倚风险较低,但它们贡献了26.9%至82%的数据。我们的效应量估计也不准确。漏斗图不对称性和敏感性分析(使用固定效应模型,并且仅纳入被判定在选择偏倚、执行偏倚或失访偏倚方面风险较低的研究)也表明,对于n-3PUFAs可能存在偏向阳性结果的偏倚。在我们对抑郁症状这一主要结局的分析中存在大量异质性。这种异质性无法通过是否存在共病或是否存在辅助治疗来解释。
对于与抗抑郁药的比较,仅有1项研究,涉及40名参与者。该研究发现,在抑郁症状方面(均数差(MD)为-0.70(95%CI -5.88至4.48))、治疗反应率或未完成情况方面,n-3PUFAs治疗与抗抑郁药治疗之间没有差异。未以适合分析的方式报告不良事件,也未报告抑郁缓解率和生活质量。
目前,我们没有足够的高质量证据来确定n-3PUFAs作为MDD治疗方法的效果。我们的初步分析表明,与安慰剂相比,n-3PUFAs对抑郁症状有小到中等程度的、非临床有益的效果;然而,该估计不准确,并且我们判定此结果所依据的证据质量为低/极低。敏感性分析、漏斗图检查以及将我们的结果与大型高质量试验的结果进行比较也表明,这种效应估计可能偏向于对n-3PUFAs的阳性发现,并且真实效果可能更小。然而,我们的数据也表明n-3PUFA组和安慰剂组的不良事件发生率和试验未完成人数相似,但同样我们的估计非常不准确。我们综述中直接比较n-3PUFAs和抗抑郁药的一项研究发现两者益处相当。需要更多证据,以及更完整的证据,特别是关于n-3PUFAs对MDD潜在的正面和负面影响。