From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (AFN, MMG, SR, RSE).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;37(3):409-417. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230339R1.
The objective of this study is to describe the facilitators and barriers of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic for primary care clinicians in safety-net settings.
We selected 5 surveys fielded between September 2020 and March 2023 from the national "Quick COVID-19 Primary Care Survey" by the Larry A. Green Center, with the Primary Care Collaborative. We used an explanatory sequential mixed method approach. We compared safety-net practices (free & charitable organization, federally qualified health center (FQHC), clinics with a 50% or greater Medicaid) to all other settings. We discuss: 1) telemedicine services provided; 2) clinician motivations; 3) and telemedicine access.
All clinicians were similarly motivated to implement telemedicine. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to report use of phone visits. These clinicians felt less "confident in my use of telemedicine" (covariate-adjusted OR = 0.611, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.87) and were more likely to report struggles with televisits in March 2023 (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.57), particularly with physical examinations. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to endorse reductions in no-shows (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.17 - 2.68). Telemedicine increased access and new patient-facing demands including portal communications.
This study enhances our understanding of the use of telemedicine within the safety-net setting. Clinician perceptions are important for identifying barriers to telemedicine following the end of the Federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Clinicians highlighted significant limitations to its use including clinical appropriateness, quality of physical examinations, and added patient-facing workload.
本研究旨在描述在 COVID-19 大流行期间,安全网环境中的初级保健临床医生使用远程医疗的促进因素和障碍。
我们从 Larry A. Green 中心与初级保健合作组织联合开展的全国性“快速 COVID-19 初级保健调查”中选择了 2020 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月期间进行的 5 项调查。我们采用了解释性顺序混合方法。我们将安全网实践(免费和慈善组织、联邦合格的健康中心 (FQHC)、 Medicaid 占比 50%或以上的诊所)与所有其他环境进行了比较。我们讨论了:1)提供的远程医疗服务;2)临床医生的动机;3)和远程医疗的可及性。
所有临床医生实施远程医疗的动机相似。安全网临床医生更有可能报告使用电话就诊。这些临床医生对自己使用远程医疗的“信心较低”(调整后的优势比=0.611,95%置信区间 0.43-0.87),并且在 2023 年 3 月更有可能报告电视就诊方面存在困难(调整后的优势比=1.73,95%置信区间 1.16-2.57),尤其是进行身体检查方面。安全网临床医生更有可能支持减少失约(调整后的优势比=1.77,95%置信区间 1.17-2.68)。远程医疗增加了可及性和新的面向患者的需求,包括门户通信。
本研究增进了我们对安全网环境中远程医疗使用的理解。临床医生的看法对于在联邦 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件结束后识别远程医疗障碍很重要。临床医生强调了其使用的重大限制,包括临床适宜性、身体检查质量和增加的面向患者的工作量。