From the Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (JLF); Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced (JLF, DDP); Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis (BES); Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley (HPR); Department of Health, Society and Behavior, Public Health Program, University of California, Irvine (DDP).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Oct 11;36(5):712-722. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220370R2. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) rapidly adopted and implemented telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzes FQHC personnel accounts of care redesign strategies to support telemedicine implementation in 2020 and 2021, and identifies improvement opportunities.
We conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with clinic personnel (n = 15) at 2 FQHCs in Northern California (December 2020-April 2021) to examine telemedicine adoption and use of audio-video and audio-only/phone telemedicine encounters.
FQHC clinicians and staff reported that telemedicine implementation increased access to care and reduced appointment no-show rates. However, a reported reduced ability to develop and foster interpersonal connections negatively impacted clinician-patient relationships. Care redesign strategies included systems to triage appointment types (in-person versus virtual), work-arounds to screen for and address social and nonmedical needs, and new protocols to navigate privacy needs for first time telemedicine users. In addition, increasing remote monitoring capabilities was deemed an important priority for improving telemedicine use for marginalized populations.
Telemedicine implementation in FQHCs involved care redesign to optimize virtual interactions and care processes. Guidelines and evidence-based practices are needed to improve telemedicine use in FQHCs, including strategies to support interpersonal connections; approaches to virtually screen for and address social needs; and protocols to further mitigate privacy issues. Future research is needed to identify when telemedicine can optimally supplement in-person care to improve patient outcomes and clinic efficiency, particularly in safety net settings.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,合格的联邦健康中心(FQHC)迅速采用并实施了远程医疗。本研究分析了 FQHC 人员支持 2020 年和 2021 年远程医疗实施的重新设计策略,以确定改进机会。
我们对北加利福尼亚州的 2 家 FQHC 的临床医生和工作人员(n=15)进行了半结构式深入访谈,以研究远程医疗的采用情况以及使用音频-视频和仅音频/电话远程医疗的情况。
FQHC 临床医生和工作人员报告说,远程医疗的实施增加了获得医疗的机会,并降低了预约失约率。然而,报告称,发展和培养人际联系的能力下降,对医患关系产生了负面影响。重新设计的策略包括对预约类型(面对面与虚拟)进行分类的系统、解决社会和非医疗需求的解决方案,以及为首次使用远程医疗的用户解决隐私需求的新协议。此外,增加远程监测能力被认为是改善远程医疗在 FQHC 中的使用的重要优先事项,尤其是在边缘人群中。
FQHC 中的远程医疗实施涉及重新设计以优化虚拟互动和护理流程。需要制定指南和循证实践,以改善 FQHC 中的远程医疗使用,包括支持人际联系的策略;虚拟筛查和解决社会需求的方法;以及进一步缓解隐私问题的协议。未来的研究需要确定远程医疗何时可以最佳地补充面对面护理,以改善患者的治疗效果和诊所的效率,特别是在安全网环境中。