Yang Haoyang, Dai Chenglin, Zhang Dongzhaoyang, Chen Can, Ye Zhao, Zhong Xin, Jia Yijun, Jiang Renqing, Du Wenqiong, Zong Zhaowen
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury, Department for Combat Casualty Care Training, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury, Department for Combat Casualty Care Training, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
Chin J Traumatol. 2025 May;28(3):220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
To compare the effects of empirical and modified hemostatic resuscitation for liver blast injury combined with seawater immersion.
Thirty rabbits were subjected to liver blast injury combined with seawater immersion, and were then divided into 3 groups randomly (n = 10 each): group A (no treatment after immersion), group B (empirical resuscitation with 20 mL hydroxyethyl starch, 50 mg tranexamic acid, 25 IU prothrombin complex concentrate and 50 mg/kg body weight fibrinogen concentrate), and group C (modified resuscitation with additional 10 IU prothrombin complex concentrate and 20 mg/kg body weight fibrinogen concentrate based on group B). Blood samples were gathered at specified moments for assessment of thromboelastography, routine coagulation test, and biochemistry. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and survival rate were also documented at each time point. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine the normality of data distribution. Multigroup comparisons were conducted with one-way ANOVA.
Liver blast injury combined with seawater immersion resulted in severe coagulo-fibrinolytic derangement as indicated by prolonged prothrombin time (s) (11.53 ± 0.98 vs. 7.61 ± 0.28, p<0.001), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (s) (33.48 ± 6.66 vs. 18.23 ± 0.89, p<0.001), reaction time (R) (min) (5.85 ± 0.96 vs. 2.47 ± 0.53, p<0.001), decreased maximum amplitude (MA) (mm) (53.20 ± 5.99 vs. 74.92 ± 5.76, p<0.001) and fibrinogen concentration (g/L) (1.19 ± 0.29 vs. 1.89 ± 0.32, p = 0.003), and increased D-dimer concentration (mg/L) (0.38 ± 0.32 vs. 0.05 ± 0.03, p = 0.005). Both empirical and modified hemostatic resuscitation could improve the coagulo-fibrinolytic states and organ function, as indicated by shortened APTT and R values, decreased D-dimer concentration, increased fibrinogen concentration and MA values, lower concentration of blood urea nitrogen and creatine kinase-MB in group B and group C rabbits in comparison to that observed in group A. Further analysis found that the R values (min) (4.67 ± 0.84 vs. 3.66 ± 0.98, p = 0.038), APTT (s) (23.16 ± 2.75 vs. 18.94 ± 1.05, p = 0.001), MA (mm) (60.10 ± 4.74 vs. 70.21 ± 3.01, p < 0.001), and fibrinogen concentration (g/L) (1.68 ± 0.21 vs. 1.94 ± 0.16, p = 0.013) were remarkably improved in group C than in group B at 2 h and 4 h after injury. In addition, the concentration of blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L) (24.11 ± 1.96 vs. 21.00 ± 3.78, p = 0.047) and creatine kinase-MB (U/L) (85.50 ± 13.60 vs. 69.74 ± 8.56, p = 0.013) were lower in group C than in group B at 6 h after injury. The survival rates in group B and group C were significantly higher than those in group A at 4 h and 6 h after injury (p < 0.001), however, there were no statistical differences in survival rates between group B and group C at each time point.
Modified hemostatic resuscitation could improve the coagulation parameters and organ function better than empirical hemostatic resuscitation.
比较经验性止血复苏与改良止血复苏对肝脏爆炸伤合并海水浸泡的影响。
30只兔制作肝脏爆炸伤合并海水浸泡模型,然后随机分为3组(每组10只):A组(浸泡后不处理)、B组(经验性复苏,给予20 mL羟乙基淀粉、50 mg氨甲环酸、25 IU凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂和50 mg/kg体重纤维蛋白原浓缩剂)、C组(在B组基础上改良复苏,额外给予10 IU凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂和20 mg/kg体重纤维蛋白原浓缩剂)。在特定时刻采集血样,用于血栓弹力图、常规凝血试验及生化指标评估。记录各时间点的平均动脉压、心率及生存率。采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验数据分布的正态性。多组比较采用单因素方差分析。
肝脏爆炸伤合并海水浸泡导致严重的凝血-纤溶紊乱,表现为凝血酶原时间(秒)延长(11.53±0.98 vs. 7.61±0.28,p<0.001)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT,秒)延长(33.48±6.66 vs. 18.23±0.89,p<0.001)、反应时间(R,分钟)延长(5.85±0.96 vs. 2.47±0.53,p<0.001)、最大振幅(MA,毫米)降低(53.20±5.99 vs. 74.92±5.76,p<0.001)、纤维蛋白原浓度(克/升)降低(1.19±0.29 vs. 1.89±0.32,p = 0.003)、D-二聚体浓度(毫克/升)升高(0.38±0.32 vs. 0.05±0.03,p = 0.005)。经验性止血复苏和改良止血复苏均可改善凝血-纤溶状态及器官功能,表现为B组和C组兔的APTT和R值缩短、D-二聚体浓度降低、纤维蛋白原浓度和MA值升高,与A组相比,血尿素氮和肌酸激酶-MB浓度降低。进一步分析发现,伤后2小时和4小时,C组的R值(分钟)(4.67±0.84 vs. 3.66±0.98,p = 0.038)、APTT(秒)(23.16±2.75 vs. 18.94±1.05,p = 0.001)、MA(毫米)(60.10±4.74 vs. 70.21±3.01,p<0.001)及纤维蛋白原浓度(克/升)(1.68±0.21 vs. 1.94±0.16,p = 0.013)较B组明显改善。此外,伤后6小时,C组血尿素氮(毫摩尔/升)浓度(24.11±1.96 vs. 21.00±3.78,p = 0.047)和肌酸激酶-MB(U/L)浓度(85.50±13.60 vs. 69.74±8.56,p = 0.013)低于B组。伤后4小时和6小时,B组和C组的生存率明显高于A组(p<0.001),但各时间点B组和C组生存率无统计学差异。
改良止血复苏比经验性止血复苏能更好地改善凝血参数及器官功能。