Bonadio Renata Colombo, de Sousa Isadora Martins, Balint Flávia Cavalcanti, Comini Ana Carolina Marin, Tavares Monique Celeste, Madasi Fernanda, Bines Jose, Ferreira Rafael Dal Ponte, Rosa Daniela Dornelles, Santos Candice Lima, de Souza Zenaide Silva, Assad-Suzuki Daniele, de Araújo Júlio Antônio Pereira, Gagliato Débora de Melo, Dos Anjos Carlos Henrique, Zucchetti Bruna M, Ferrari Anezka, de Brito Mayana Lopes, Cangussu Renata, Monteiro Maria Marcela Fernandes, Hoff Paulo M, Testa Laura, Barroso-Sousa Romualdo
Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Grupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024 Aug 14;10(1):73. doi: 10.1038/s41523-024-00676-w.
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P + CT) has emerged as a standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the best anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC) schedule remains to be determined. While the KEYNOTE-522 regimen employs AC every 3 weeks (q3w AC), previous studies have shown overall survival benefits of dose-dense regimens for early-stage breast cancer. The Neo-Real study (GBECAM-0123) is a real-world data effort evaluating patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant P + CT in ten cancer centers since July 2020. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dose-dense AC (ddAC) versus q3w AC. Among 333 patients included until November 2023, 311 completed neoadjuvant therapy and 279 underwent surgery with pathology reports available; ddAC was used in 58.2% and q3w AC in 41.8% of the cases. Most patients (69.1%) had stage II TNBC. A pCR was observed in 65.4% with ddAC and 58.7% with q3w AC (P = 0.260), while RCB 0-1 occurred in 82.4% and 73.5%, respectively (P = 0.115). Patients with stage III disease had a numerically higher pCR with ddAC (59% vs 40%, P = 0.155), while pCR rates were similar regardless of AC regimen in stage II disease (66.6% vs 64.5%; P = 0.760). While no significant disparities in drug discontinuation was noted, ddAC showed a trend towards higher rates of grade ≥3 AE (40.5% vs. 30.7%, P = 0.092). The Neo-Real study could not rule out a difference between ddAC and q3w AC during neoadjuvant P + CT. The observation of a potentially higher pCR with ddAC in stage III disease warrants further investigation.
新辅助派姆单抗联合化疗(P+CT)已成为II-III期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的标准治疗方案。然而,最佳的蒽环类药物-环磷酰胺(AC)给药方案仍有待确定。虽然KEYNOTE-522方案采用每3周一次的AC给药(q3w AC),但先前的研究表明,剂量密集方案对早期乳腺癌有总体生存益处。Neo-Real研究(GBECAM-0123)是一项真实世界数据研究,自2020年7月起在十个癌症中心评估接受新辅助P+CT治疗的TNBC患者。本分析的目的是评估剂量密集AC(ddAC)与q3w AC的有效性和安全性。在截至2023年11月纳入的333例患者中,311例完成了新辅助治疗,279例接受了手术并获得了病理报告;58.2%的病例使用了ddAC,41.8%的病例使用了q3w AC。大多数患者(69.1%)为II期TNBC。ddAC组的病理完全缓解(pCR)率为65.4%,q3w AC组为58.7%(P=0.260),而残余癌负荷(RCB)0-1级分别发生在82.4%和73.5%的患者中(P=0.115)。III期疾病患者中,ddAC的pCR数值上更高(59%对40%,P=0.155),而II期疾病中无论AC方案如何,pCR率相似(66.6%对64.5%;P=0.760)。虽然在药物停用方面未发现显著差异,但ddAC显示出≥3级不良事件发生率更高的趋势(40.5%对30.7%,P=0.092)。Neo-Real研究不能排除新辅助P+CT期间ddAC与q3w AC之间的差异。在III期疾病中观察到ddAC可能有更高的pCR,这值得进一步研究。