Melander Pernille, Vang Maria Louison, Lindekilde Nanna, Andersen Lars Peter Sønderbo, Elklit Ask, Pihl-Thingvad Jesper
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 31;15:1425254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1425254. eCollection 2024.
Social support is considered an important factor in prevention of mental illness. However, little is known about the association between ambulance personnel's use of multiple types of social support and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). This study aims to assess if number of used social support types predicts PTSS for ambulance personnel. Apart from assessing the main effect of social support utilization, we were interested in investigating if social support utilization moderated the effect of frequency of critical events on PTSS.
A total of 383 ambulance personnel completed a survey consisting of validated questionnaires. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association between frequency of traumatic exposure and utilization of social support and PTSS as outcome variable.
Higher number of utilized social support types was associated with higher levels of PTSS (β = 0.15, p <.001). When serving as a moderator of the association between frequency of exposure to critical incidents and PTSS, social support utilization had a significant and positive interaction effect (β = 0.26, p = .049). 307 participants had used 2 or 3 types of informal support during the past year, whereas 81 had used 2 or 3 types of formal support.
To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the relationship between utilization of multiple, concurrent social support types and PTSS. This study suggests that to understand the effects of social support among ambulance personnel, it is necessary to assess the utilization of multiple concurrent support types, contributing factors to social support use, and different patterns of social support utilization that constitutes professional life in ambulance work.
社会支持被认为是预防精神疾病的一个重要因素。然而,关于急救人员对多种类型社会支持的使用与创伤后应激症状(PTSS)之间的关联,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在评估所使用的社会支持类型数量是否能预测急救人员的创伤后应激症状。除了评估社会支持利用的主要影响外,我们还对调查社会支持利用是否调节关键事件频率对创伤后应激症状的影响感兴趣。
共有383名急救人员完成了一项由经过验证的问卷组成的调查。进行分层多元线性回归分析,以评估创伤暴露频率、社会支持利用与作为结果变量的创伤后应激症状之间的关联。
使用的社会支持类型数量越多,创伤后应激症状水平越高(β = 0.15,p <.001)。当作为暴露于关键事件频率与创伤后应激症状之间关联的调节因素时,社会支持利用具有显著的正向交互作用(β = 0.26,p =.049)。307名参与者在过去一年中使用了2种或3种非正式支持类型,而81名参与者使用了2种或3种正式支持类型。
据我们所知,这是第一项研究多种同时使用的社会支持类型与创伤后应激症状之间关系的研究。本研究表明,要了解急救人员中社会支持的影响,有必要评估多种同时使用的支持类型及其利用情况、社会支持使用的促成因素,以及构成急救工作职业生活的不同社会支持利用模式。