Yuan Maoxiu, Zhang Hai, Wei Mingchao, Lan Caiyun, Zhang Zhenyang, Huang Ling, Zhou Jianzhong, He Haiquan, Koyanagi Kazuo, Feng Qingyi, Lin Jiangbo
The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4543-4552. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-657. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
There are multiple choices for the nutritional management mode after esophageal cancer surgery. Currently, there is still controversy regarding which nutritional management mode has an impact on the postoperative recovery and overall survival (OS) of patients. This study aims to compare the differences between two commonly used clinical nutritional management modes: jejunostomy feeding plus oral intake (JF plus OI) and intravenous nutrition plus oral intake (IN plus OI), in terms of short-term efficacy and 3-year OS, in order to further explore the optimal mode of enteral nutrition management after esophageal cancer surgery.
We evaluated esophageal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2020. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the perioperative complications, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) nutritional scores at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery, as well as the 3-year OS rates, between two different nutritional management approaches: JF plus OI and IN plus OI following esophageal cancer surgery.
Among the 822 patients included, 668 and 154 patients belonged to JF plus OI and IN plus OI groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 149 patients per group were evaluated. The amount of gastric drainage fluid was higher in the IN plus OI group (P<0.05), and the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal emptying disorder and intestinal obstruction was significantly higher in the JF plus OI group (P<0.05). The IN plus OI group had a higher incidence of perioperative hypoproteinemia (P<0.05), and a higher risk of malnutrition in 2 weeks after surgery (P<0.05). The 3-year OS was not significantly different (P>0.05).
JF plus OI may be the preferable nutritional management approach after esophageal cancer resection as it can potentially reduce perioperative nutritional deficiency. However, attention should be paid to the risk of gastrointestinal emptying and intestinal obstruction associated with JF.
食管癌手术后的营养管理模式有多种选择。目前,关于哪种营养管理模式对患者术后恢复和总生存期(OS)有影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较两种常用的临床营养管理模式:空肠造口喂养加口服摄入(JF加OI)和静脉营养加口服摄入(IN加OI)在短期疗效和3年总生存期方面的差异,以进一步探索食管癌手术后肠内营养管理的最佳模式。
我们评估了2010年1月1日至2020年1月1日在福建医科大学附属协和医院接受根治性手术的食管癌患者。本分析的目的是比较两种不同营养管理方法(食管癌手术后的JF加OI和IN加OI)之间的围手术期并发症、术后1周、2周、1个月和3个月时的营养风险筛查2002(NRS2002)营养评分以及3年总生存率。
在纳入的822例患者中,分别有668例和154例患者属于JF加OI组和IN加OI组。经过倾向评分匹配后,每组评估149例患者。IN加OI组的胃引流液量更高(P<0.05),JF加OI组术后胃肠排空障碍和肠梗阻的发生率显著更高(P<0.05)。IN加OI组围手术期低蛋白血症的发生率更高(P<0.05),术后2周营养不良风险更高(P<0.05)。3年总生存期无显著差异(P>0.05)。
JF加OI可能是食管癌切除术后更可取的营养管理方法,因为它可能降低围手术期营养缺乏的风险。然而,应注意与JF相关的胃肠排空和肠梗阻风险。