Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;164(2):422-432.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.050. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
Routine feeding jejunostomy tube post esophagectomy is being revaluated because of its associated postoperative complications. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of routine feeding jejunostomy tube insertion on mortality and postesophagectomy outcomes.
Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were queried through December 2020. Included studies compared esophagectomy with and without postoperative feeding jejunostomy. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included readmission rate, length of stay, postoperative complications (sepsis, pneumonia, chyle leakage, and anastomotic leakage), and duration of surgery. Random effects pairwise meta-analysis was used to compare groups, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
The meta-analyses of 12 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 10 observational) that enrolled 36,284 participants showed lower 30-day all-cause mortality in the jejunostomy tube group (risk ratio [RR] = 1.53 [95% CI, 1.37-1.70], P < .01; I = 0%, P = .80). Duration of surgery favored the no jejunostomy group (mean difference = -37.18; 95% CI, -59.48 to -14.87; P < .01). However, the 2 groups were not different in incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.61-1.28; P = .50), length of stay (mean difference = -0.22; 95% CI, -1.34-0.89; P = .69), readmission (RR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92-1.02; P = .20), chyle leakage (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.34-3.27; P = .94), sepsis (RR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.96-1.50; P = .11), pneumonia (RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.03; P = .11).
Feeding jejunostomy tube after esophagectomy might lead to lower 30-day all-cause mortality with no difference in common postesophagectomy complications. A routine insertion of a jejunostomy tube should be considered at the time of surgery for esophageal cancer resection.
由于术后并发症,常规经空肠饲管喂养在食管切除术后正重新评估。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估常规经空肠饲管插入对死亡率和食管切除术后结果的影响。
通过 2020 年 12 月检索电子数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库)。纳入的研究比较了有和无术后经空肠饲管喂养的食管切除术。主要结局为 30 天死亡率。次要结局包括再入院率、住院时间、术后并发症(脓毒症、肺炎、乳糜漏和吻合口漏)和手术持续时间。使用随机效应成对荟萃分析比较组间差异,使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
对 12 项研究(2 项随机对照试验,10 项观察性研究)的荟萃分析纳入了 36284 名参与者,显示空肠饲管组 30 天全因死亡率较低(风险比[RR] = 1.53 [95% CI,1.37-1.70],P < 0.01;I ² = 0%,P = 0.80)。手术时间有利于无空肠饲管组(平均差值 = -37.18;95% CI,-59.48 至 -14.87;P < 0.01)。然而,两组吻合口漏的发生率无差异(RR = 0.88;95% CI,0.61-1.28;P = 0.50),住院时间(平均差值 = -0.22;95% CI,-1.34 至 0.89;P = 0.69)、再入院率(RR = 0.97;95% CI,0.92-1.02;P = 0.20)、乳糜漏(RR = 1.05;95% CI,0.34-3.27;P = 0.94)、脓毒症(RR = 1.20;95% CI,0.96-1.50;P = 0.11)、肺炎(RR = 0.88;95% CI,0.75-1.03;P = 0.11)。
食管切除术后经空肠饲管喂养可能会降低 30 天全因死亡率,而不会增加常见的食管切除术后并发症。对于食管癌切除术,应在手术时考虑常规插入空肠饲管。