• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻素认知、向医疗服务提供者报告使用情况以及对安全性的认知——宾夕法尼亚州,2023年3月至2023年4月

Cannabinoid Awareness, Reporting Use to Health Care Providers, and Perceptions Regarding Safety - Pennsylvania, March 2023-April 2023.

作者信息

Kocis Paul T, Mallinson Daniel J, Servinsky Timothy J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

School of Public Affairs, Penn State University, Harrisburg, PA, USA.

出版信息

Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Jul 17;7(1):119-124. doi: 10.1159/000539956. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1159/000539956
PMID:39144528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11324245/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With the continued societal and policy interest in cannabinoids, the Penn State Harrisburg Center for Survey Research (CSR) conducted a web survey (Cannabinoid Lion Poll) for adult-aged Pennsylvanians between March 6 and April 2, 2023.

METHODS

The Lion Poll omnibus survey asked questions of adult-aged Pennsylvanians to assess awareness of cannabidiol (CBD) and products containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), including marijuana, the likelihood of reporting cannabinoid use to health care providers (HCPs), and perceptions regarding safety.

RESULTS

Of these 1,045 respondents, 51.2% were female; 83.0% were white, non-Hispanic; and 48.6% and 27.5% were within the 35-64-year and 18-34-year age ranges, respectively. Of the respondents, 52.1% and 53.9% told their HCPs they took CBD or products containing THC, respectively. Alcohol was perceived by the large proportion of respondents as unsafe (47.3%), followed by products containing THC (25.2%), anxiety/depression medications (21.7%), CBD (16.1%), and over-the-counter (OTC) pain medications (8.1%). Most combinations were perceived to be unsafe when asked to consider the safety of taking them with other prescription medications. Again, alcohol was perceived to be unsafe by the largest proportion (77.4%), followed by anxiety/depression medications (43.2%), products containing THC (42.6%), CBD (33.4%), and then OTC pain medications (24.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adult-aged Pennsylvanians perceive CBD and THC containing products as safer than alcohol. There is considerable underreporting of cannabinoid use to HCPs, and therefore significant implications for patient safety. It remains vital that HCPs have open communications with their patients about cannabinoid use.

摘要

引言

随着社会和政策对大麻素持续关注,宾夕法尼亚州立大学哈里斯堡分校调查研究中心(CSR)于2023年3月6日至4月2日对宾夕法尼亚州成年居民开展了一项网络调查(大麻素狮子民意调查)。

方法

狮子民意综合调查向宾夕法尼亚州成年居民提问,以评估他们对大麻二酚(CBD)以及含四氢大麻酚(THC)产品(包括大麻)的认知、向医疗服务提供者(HCP)报告使用大麻素情况的可能性以及对安全性的看法。

结果

在这1045名受访者中,51.2%为女性;83.0%为非西班牙裔白人;分别有48.6%和27.5%的受访者年龄在35 - 64岁和18 - 34岁之间。在受访者中,分别有52.1%和53.9%的人告知其医疗服务提供者他们使用了CBD或含THC的产品。大部分受访者认为酒精不安全(47.3%),其次是含THC的产品(25.2%)、抗焦虑/抑郁药物(21.7%)、CBD(16.1%)和非处方(OTC)止痛药物(8.1%)。当被问及与其他处方药同时服用的安全性时,大多数组合被认为不安全。同样,大部分人认为酒精不安全(77.4%),其次是抗焦虑/抑郁药物(43.2%)、含THC的产品(42.6%)、CBD(33.4%),然后是非处方止痛药物(24.8%)。

结论

宾夕法尼亚州成年居民认为含CBD和THC的产品比酒精更安全。向医疗服务提供者报告使用大麻素的情况严重不足,因此对患者安全有重大影响。医疗服务提供者与患者就大麻素的使用进行开放沟通仍然至关重要。

相似文献

1
Cannabinoid Awareness, Reporting Use to Health Care Providers, and Perceptions Regarding Safety - Pennsylvania, March 2023-April 2023.大麻素认知、向医疗服务提供者报告使用情况以及对安全性的认知——宾夕法尼亚州,2023年3月至2023年4月
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Jul 17;7(1):119-124. doi: 10.1159/000539956. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Homegrown perceptions about the medical use and potential abuse of CBD and THC.关于大麻二酚(CBD)和四氢大麻酚(THC)医疗用途及潜在滥用的本土认知。
Addict Behav. 2021 Apr;115:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106799. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Differences in prescribed medicinal cannabis use by cannabinoid product composition: Findings from the cannabis as medicine survey 2020 (CAMS-20) Australia-wide study.不同大麻素产品成分的处方医用大麻使用差异:来自 2020 年澳大利亚全国医用大麻调查(CAMS-20)的研究结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0297092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297092. eCollection 2024.
4
Cannabinoid Content and Label Accuracy of Hemp-Derived Topical Products Available Online and at National Retail Stores.大麻素含量和可在线上及全国零售商店获得的 Hemp-Derived 局部用产品标签准确性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23019.
5
Use and Reported Helpfulness of Cannabinoids Among Primary Care Patients in Vermont.佛蒙特州初级保健患者中使用和报告的大麻素的有效性。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720946954. doi: 10.1177/2150132720946954.
6
Knowledge of Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Levels Among Cannabis Consumers in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大大麻消费者中四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚水平的相关知识。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022 Jun;7(3):345-354. doi: 10.1089/can.2020.0092. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Assessment of Orally Administered Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol When Coadministered With Cannabidiol on Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.评估口服给予 Δ9-四氢大麻酚与大麻二酚联合使用对健康成年人中 Δ9-四氢大麻酚药代动力学和药效学的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254752. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54752.
8
Safety and Tolerability of Natural and Synthetic Cannabinoids in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Open-Label Trials and Observational Studies.老年人使用天然和合成大麻素的安全性和耐受性:开放标签试验和观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Oct;38(10):887-910. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00882-2. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
Safety and tolerability of escalating cannabinoid doses in healthy cats.在健康猫中递增大麻素剂量的安全性和耐受性。
J Feline Med Surg. 2021 Dec;23(12):1162-1175. doi: 10.1177/1098612X211004215. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
Current Cannabidiol Safety: A Review.当前大麻二酚的安全性:综述。
Curr Drug Saf. 2023;18(4):465-473. doi: 10.2174/1574886317666220902100511.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural reticence to inform physicians of cannabis use.农村地区不愿向医生告知大麻使用情况。
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e12885. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12885. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
A Pragmatic, Person-Centered View of Cannabis in the United States: Pursuing Care That Transcends Beliefs.美国的实用主义、以人为本的大麻观:追求超越信仰的关怀。
Subst Abus. 2023 Oct;44(4):337-347. doi: 10.1177/08897077231202836. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Drug-Drug Interactions.Δ-9-四氢大麻酚与大麻二酚的药物相互作用。
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2020 Jul 7;3(1):61-73. doi: 10.1159/000507998. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Physicians' experiences, attitudes, and beliefs towards medical cannabis: a systematic literature review.
医生对医用大麻的经验、态度和信念:系统文献综述。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Oct 21;22(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01559-w.
4
Assessing Health Care Providers' Knowledge of Medical Cannabis.评估医疗保健提供者对医用大麻的认知。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022 Aug;7(4):501-507. doi: 10.1089/can.2021.0032. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
5
Anesthesia for Patients Who Self-Report Cannabis (Marijuana) Use Before Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Retrospective Review.自我报告在食管胃十二指肠镜检查前使用大麻(大麻)的患者的麻醉:回顾性研究。
AANA J. 2021 Jun;89(3):205-212.
6
Communication between healthcare providers and medical cannabis patients regarding referral and medication substitution.医疗服务提供者与医用大麻患者之间关于转诊和药物替代的沟通。
J Cannabis Res. 2021 Jan 24;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42238-021-00058-0.
7
Medical Reasons for Marijuana Use, Forms of Use, and Patient Perception of Physician Attitudes Among the US Population.美国人群中使用大麻的医学原因、使用形式以及患者对医生态度的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):1979-1986. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05800-7. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Evidence shows that cannabis has fewer relative harms than opioids.证据表明,大麻的相对危害比阿片类药物少。
CMAJ. 2020 Feb 18;192(7):E166-E167. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.74120.
9
A survey of the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about medical cannabis among primary care providers.基层医疗保健提供者对医用大麻的态度、信念和知识的调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 22;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0906-y.
10
Lack of Communication about Medical Marijuana Use between Doctors and Their Patients.医生与患者之间缺乏关于医用大麻使用的沟通。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):805-808. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.170462.