Yang Miaomiao, Jiang Xiongying, Liu Huan, Zhang Qingyu, Li Jing, Shao Li, Zhao Lei
Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1410767. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1410767. eCollection 2024.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of the combined approach involving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study conducted from January 2020 to December 2023, we reviewed advanced HCC patients who were treated either with HAIC alone or with a combination of HAIC and TKIs. To address initial disparities between the two groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM). Tumor response evaluation was performed following RECIST 1.1 criteria. We compared survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), between the two treatment groups. Safety assessments were conducted for all patients. RESULTS: Following the eligibility review, 138 patients underwent combined treatment with HAIC and TKIs (HT group), while 198 patients received HAIC monotherapy (HA group) and met the inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study. After PSM, 107 patients were assigned to each group. The HT group exhibited a longer median OS (18.0 8.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52, p < 0.001) compared to the HA group. Median PFS was also longer in the HT group, although without statistical significance (6.0 4.7 months; HR, 0.85, p = 0.265). The HT group demonstrated a higher ORR (41.1% 25.2%; p = 0.020). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of all adverse events (AEs) or grade 3/4 AEs (any grade: 81.2% for HT 78.8% for HA, p = 0.68; grade 3/4: 18.1% for HT 13.6% for HA, p = 0.29). Importantly, all AEs were manageable and acceptable. Notably, no grade 5 AEs occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy involving HAIC and TKIs effectively prolonged survival in advanced HCC patients. It represented a preferable alternative to HAIC monotherapy, with manageable safety.
目的:本研究旨在评估肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的临床疗效和安全性。 患者与方法:在这项于2020年1月至2023年12月进行的多中心回顾性研究中,我们回顾了接受单纯HAIC治疗或HAIC与TKIs联合治疗的晚期HCC患者。为解决两组之间的初始差异,我们采用了倾向评分匹配(PSM)。根据RECIST 1.1标准进行肿瘤反应评估。我们比较了两个治疗组之间的生存结果,包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。对所有患者进行了安全性评估。 结果:经过资格审查,138例患者接受了HAIC与TKIs的联合治疗(HT组),而198例患者接受了HAIC单药治疗(HA组)并符合本研究的纳入标准。PSM后,每组分配107例患者。与HA组相比,HT组的中位OS更长(18.0±8.8个月;风险比[HR],0.52,p<0.001)。HT组的中位PFS也更长,尽管无统计学意义(6.0±4.7个月;HR,0.85,p = 0.265)。HT组的ORR更高(41.1%±25.2%;p = 0.020)。两组在所有不良事件(AE)或3/4级AE的发生率上均未观察到显著差异(任何级别:HT组为81.2%,HA组为78.8%,p = 0.68;3/4级:HT组为18.1%,HA组为13.6%,p = 0.29)。重要的是,所有AE均可控且可接受。值得注意的是,两组均未发生5级AE。 结论:HAIC与TKIs的联合治疗有效延长了晚期HCC患者的生存期。它是HAIC单药治疗的一种更优选择,安全性可控。