Li Zixiong, Xu Yanping, Qu Wenshu, Liu Ping, Zhu Yan, Li Hui, Guo Ying, Liu Xiufeng
Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2023 Oct 30;26(6):534. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14121. eCollection 2023 Dec.
At present, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often applied to patients who are not suitable or are unwilling to undergo surgical treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HCC have not been fully demonstrated. Published studies involving the treatment of patients with HCC with HAIC, ICIs and TKIs were searched from public databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Sinomed. Efficacy and safety data for each study, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The present study included 17 treatment groups from 15 studies, including 1,987 patients with HCC in the systematic review. The target population was dominated by those unsuitable for surgical treatment, with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and Child-Pugh score A or B. The results showed that the longest estimated median PFS (95% CI) in the HAIC + ICI/TKI therapy group (group C) was 9.37 months (95% CI, 6.81-11.93); in the HAIC therapy group (group B) was 7.45 months (95% CI, 6.45-8.46); and in the ICIs + other systemic therapies group (group A) was 5.92 months (95% CI, 5.31-6.54). There was no significant difference in the expected OS among the three groups, which may be because OS events were not reached in numerous studies during the follow-up time. The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, such as increased AST [14/221 (6.33%)], increased ALT [13/221 (5.88%)], and decreased platelet count [13/221 (5.88%)], was not significantly increased in group C when compared with groups A or B (P>0.05). In conclusion, the effectiveness of HAIC + ICI/TKI for the treatment of advanced HCC was better than that of ICIs + other systemic therapies or HAIC alone. In addition, the incidence of AEs above grade 3 was not significantly higher compared with that in the other treatment groups, and the safety profile was good.
目前,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)常用于不适合或不愿接受手术治疗的患者。然而,据我们所知,HAIC联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗HCC的疗效和安全性尚未得到充分证实。从包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和中国生物医学文献数据库在内的公共数据库中检索已发表的涉及HAIC、ICIs和TKIs治疗HCC患者的研究。收集每项研究的疗效和安全性数据,包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)。本研究纳入了15项研究中的17个治疗组,系统评价中共纳入1987例HCC患者。目标人群主要是那些不适合手术治疗的患者,巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期为B或C期,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态≤2,Child-Pugh评分A或B。结果显示,HAIC+ICI/TKI治疗组(C组)估计最长中位PFS(95%CI)为9.37个月(95%CI,6.81-11.93);HAIC治疗组(B组)为7.45个月(95%CI,6.45-8.46);ICIs+其他全身治疗组(A组)为5.92个月(95%CI,5.31-6.54)。三组的预期OS无显著差异,这可能是因为在随访期间许多研究中未达到OS事件。与A组或B组相比,C组治疗相关不良反应的发生率,如AST升高[14/221(6.33%)]、ALT升高[13/221(5.88%)]和血小板计数降低[13/221(5.88%)],没有显著增加(P>0.05)。总之,HAIC+ICI/TKI治疗晚期HCC的有效性优于ICIs+其他全身治疗或单独使用HAIC。此外,3级以上AE的发生率与其他治疗组相比没有显著更高,安全性良好。