Zhang Fengtao, Zhong Sheng, Wei Qiming, Zhang Haiming, Hu Honglei, Zeng Bicheng, Zheng Xiang
Vascular Interventional Surgery, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital(Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Tumor and Vascellum Intervention, DongGuan Tungwah Hospital, DongGuan, Guangdong, 523000, People's Republic of China.
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Oct 16;11:1961-1978. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S483824. eCollection 2024.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1) inhibitors in MVI-positive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).
From September 2017 to May 2019, we retrospectively collected the clinical data from three medical centers in China pertaining to patients diagnosed with BCLC C stage HCC with MVI and receiving treatment with a combination of HAIC and PD-1 inhibitors treatment or HAIC alone, and we compared the efficacy of HAIC combined with PD-1 inhibitors and HAIC monotherapy. Propensity score matching(PSM) was utilized to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Survival outcomes and tumor response rate were used to assess survival benefits, while the incidence of adverse events was used to evaluate safety.
After screening for eligibility, 489 patients diagnosed with HCC and concomitant MVI were enrolled. Of these, 173 patients received treatment combining HAIC with PD-1 inhibitors, while 316 patients underwent HAIC monotherapy. After PSM adjustment, the combination therapy group demonstrate superior survival outcomes. Median overall survival(OS) and progression free survival(PFS) were 31.8 months and 10.8 months, respectively, significantly higher than those in the monotherapy group (OS: 10.0 months; PFS: 6.1 months; both P<0.0001). Moreover, ORR and DCR remained significantly elevated in the combination therapy group (ORR: 44.3% vs 20.4%, P<0.0001; DCR: 89.8% vs 82.0%, P=0.041). Safety profiles indicated no significant differences in adverse event rates between the two treatment groups, encompassing both overall and grade-specific assessments.
Compared to HAIC alone, the combination of HAIC with PD-1 inhibitors represents a more promising and effective approach for patients with HCC complicated by macrovascular invasion.
探讨肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)联合程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD1)抑制剂治疗微血管侵犯(MVI)阳性的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。
回顾性收集2017年9月至2019年5月中国三个医学中心诊断为BCLC C期伴有MVI的HCC患者接受HAIC联合PD-1抑制剂治疗或单纯HAIC治疗的临床资料,并比较HAIC联合PD-1抑制剂与单纯HAIC治疗的疗效。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)法调整组间基线差异。用生存结局和肿瘤缓解率评估生存获益,用不良事件发生率评估安全性。
筛选合格后,纳入489例诊断为HCC且伴有MVI的患者。其中,173例患者接受HAIC联合PD-1抑制剂治疗,316例患者接受单纯HAIC治疗。经过PSM调整后,联合治疗组显示出更好的生存结局。中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为31.8个月和10.8个月,显著高于单药治疗组(OS:10.0个月;PFS:6.1个月;P均<0.0001)。此外,联合治疗组的客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)仍显著升高(ORR:44.3%对20.4%,P<0.0001;DCR:89.8%对82.0%,P=0.041)。安全性分析表明,两个治疗组的不良事件发生率在总体和分级评估中均无显著差异。
与单纯HAIC相比,HAIC联合PD-1抑制剂治疗对合并大血管侵犯的HCC患者是一种更有前景且有效的方法。