Spyridonidis Spyros, Dykxhoorn Jennifer, Hollander Anna-Clara, Dalman Christina, Kirkbride James B
PsyLife Group, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK.
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jul 12;3(1):sgac045. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac045. eCollection 2022 Jan.
The relationship between neighborhood-level factors and the incidence of psychotic disorders is well established. However, it is unclear whether neighborhood characteristics are also associated with age-at-first-diagnosis of these disorders. We used linked Swedish register data to identify a cohort of persons first diagnosed with an ICD-10 non-affective or affective psychotic disorder (F20-33) between 1997 and 2016. Using multilevel mixed-effect linear modelling, we investigated whether neighborhood deprivation and population density at birth were associated with age-at-first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Our final cohort included 13,440 individuals, with a median age-at-first-diagnosis of 21.8 years for women (interquartile range [IQR]: 19.0-25.5) and 22.9 years for men (IQR: 20.1-26.1; < .0001). In an unadjusted model, we found no evidence of an association between neighborhood deprivation and age-at-first-diagnosis of psychotic disorder ( = .07). However, after multivariable adjustment, age-at-first-diagnosis increased by .13 years (95% CI: .05 to .21; = .002) for a one standard deviation increase in neighborhood deprivation. This was equivalent to a later diagnosis of 47 days (95% CI: 18 to 77). We found no evidence of a different relationship for non-affective versus affective psychoses [LRT (1) = .14; = .71]. Population density was not associated with age-at-first-diagnosis in unadjusted ( = .81) or adjusted ( = .85) models. Later age-at-first-diagnosis for individuals born in more deprived neighborhoods suggests structural barriers in accessing equitable psychiatric care.
社区层面因素与精神障碍发病率之间的关系已得到充分证实。然而,尚不清楚社区特征是否也与这些疾病的首次诊断年龄相关。我们使用瑞典的关联登记数据,确定了一组在1997年至2016年间首次被诊断患有ICD - 10非情感性或情感性精神障碍(F20 - 33)的人群。通过多层次混合效应线性模型,我们研究了出生时的社区贫困程度和人口密度是否与精神障碍的首次诊断年龄相关。我们的最终队列包括13440名个体,女性首次诊断的中位年龄为21.8岁(四分位间距[IQR]:19.0 - 25.5),男性为22.9岁(IQR:20.1 - 26.1;P <.0001)。在未调整模型中,我们没有发现社区贫困程度与精神障碍首次诊断年龄之间存在关联的证据(P =.07)。然而,在多变量调整后,社区贫困程度每增加一个标准差,首次诊断年龄增加0.13岁(95%置信区间:0.05至0.21;P =.002)。这相当于诊断延迟47天(95%置信区间:18至77)。我们没有发现非情感性精神病与情感性精神病之间存在不同关系的证据[似然比检验(LRT)(1) =.14;P =.71]。在未调整(P =.81)或调整(P =.85)模型中,人口密度与首次诊断年龄均无关联。出生在贫困程度更高社区的个体首次诊断年龄较晚,这表明在获得公平的精神科护理方面存在结构性障碍。