McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 7;85(3):24m15370. doi: 10.4088/JCP.24m15370.
Our first objective was to compare the prevalence of symptomatic disorders (formerly Axis I disorders) over 24 years of prospective follow-up among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other personality disordered comparison subjects as well as recovered vs nonrecovered borderline patients. Our second objective was to assess the relationship between the absence of 5 major classes of symptomatic disorders over time and the likelihood of concurrent recovery among borderline patients. The McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD) is a naturalistic prospective follow-up study of 362 inpatients assessed at 12 contiguous 2-year follow-up waves. Symptomatic disorders were assessed at each follow-up using the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I Disorders. Generalized estimating equations were used to assess all outcomes. Data were collected from June 1992 to December 2018. Patients with BPD had significantly higher rates of all 5 types of disorders studied than comparison subjects. However, the prevalence of these disorders declined significantly over time at similar rates for both study groups. This finding was similar for recovered and nonrecovered borderline patients. When the absence of these types of comorbid disorders was used to predict recovery status, substance use disorders were a substantially stronger predictor of recovery than the other 4 classes of disorders (relative risk ratio: 2.53, < .001). The results of this study suggest that symptomatic disorders co occur less commonly with BPD over time, particularly for recovered borderline patients. They also suggest that the absence of substance use disorders is the strongest predictor of achieving recovery from BPD.
我们的首要目标是比较在 24 年的前瞻性随访中,边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者与其他人格障碍对照受试者以及已康复和未康复的边缘型患者中,症状性障碍(以前称为轴 I 障碍)的患病率。我们的第二个目标是评估在时间上不存在 5 大类别症状性障碍与边缘型患者同时康复的可能性之间的关系。麦克莱恩成人发展研究(MSAD)是一项自然前瞻性随访研究,共纳入 362 名住院患者,在 12 个连续的 2 年随访波次中进行评估。在每次随访中,使用轴 I 障碍的结构化临床访谈评估症状性障碍。使用广义估计方程评估所有结果。数据收集于 1992 年 6 月至 2018 年 12 月。BPD 患者的所有 5 种类型障碍的发生率均明显高于对照受试者。然而,这两种研究组的这些障碍的流行率均随时间显著下降,且下降速度相似。这一发现对于已康复和未康复的边缘型患者都是相似的。当不存在这些类型的共病障碍时,用于预测康复状态,物质使用障碍是康复的一个明显更强的预测因素,比其他 4 类障碍更强(相对风险比:2.53,<.001)。这项研究的结果表明,随着时间的推移,症状性障碍与 BPD 的共发率较低,特别是对于已康复的边缘型患者。它们还表明,物质使用障碍的缺失是从 BPD 中获得康复的最强预测因素。