Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Aug 1;30(8):e240-e246. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89593.
Hospitals in the US operate under various value-based payment programs, but little is known regarding the strategies they use in this context to improve quality and reduce costs, overall or in voluntary programs including Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A).
A survey was administered to hospital leaders at 588 randomly selected acute care hospitals, with oversampling of BPCI-A participants, from November 2020 to June 2021. Twenty strategies and 20 barriers were queried in 4 domains: inpatient, postacute, outpatient, and community resources for vulnerable patients.
Summary statistics were tabulated, and responses were adjusted for sampling strategy and nonresponse.
There were 203 respondents (35%), of which 159 (78%) were BPCI-A participants and 44 (22%) were nonparticipants. On average, respondents reported implementing 89% of queried strategies in the inpatient domain, such as care pathways or predictive analytics; 65% of postacute strategies, such as forming partnerships with skilled nursing facilities; 84% of outpatient strategies, such as scheduling close follow-up to prevent emergency department visits/hospitalizations; and 82% of strategies aimed at high-risk populations, such as building connections with community resources. There were no differences between BPCI-A and non-BPCI-A hospitals in 19 of 20 care redesign strategies queried. However, 78.3% of BPCI-A-participating hospitals reported programs aimed at reducing utilization of skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities compared with 37.6% of non-BPCI-A hospitals (P < .0001).
Hospitals pursue a broad range of efforts to improve quality. BPCI-A hospitals have attempted to reduce use of postacute care, but otherwise the strategies they pursue are similar to other hospitals.
美国的医院根据各种基于价值的支付计划运营,但对于它们在这种情况下为提高质量和降低成本而使用的策略知之甚少,无论是在整体层面还是在包括改善护理捆绑支付先进计划(BPCI-A)在内的自愿计划中。
2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 6 月,对随机选择的 588 家急症护理医院的医院领导进行了一项调查,对 BPCI-A 参与者进行了过采样。在 4 个领域中查询了 20 项策略和 20 个障碍:住院、康复后、门诊和弱势患者的社区资源。
对汇总统计数据进行制表,并根据抽样策略和无应答情况对结果进行调整。
共有 203 名受访者(35%),其中 159 名(78%)是 BPCI-A 参与者,44 名(22%)是非参与者。平均而言,受访者报告在住院领域实施了 89%的查询策略,例如护理路径或预测分析;65%的康复后策略,如与熟练护理设施建立合作关系;84%的门诊策略,如安排密切随访以防止急诊就诊/住院;以及 82%的针对高危人群的策略,如与社区资源建立联系。在询问的 20 项护理再设计策略中,BPCI-A 医院和非 BPCI-A 医院之间没有差异。然而,与非 BPCI-A 医院的 37.6%相比,78.3%的 BPCI-A 参与医院报告了旨在减少熟练护理和住院康复设施使用的计划(P < 0.0001)。
医院采取了广泛的措施来提高质量。BPCI-A 医院已尝试减少康复后护理的使用,但除此之外,他们所采用的策略与其他医院相似。