• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Abortion Return Rates and Wait Times Before and After Texas' Executive Order Banning Abortion During COVID-19.德克萨斯州行政命令禁止在 COVID-19 期间进行堕胎后,堕胎的返回率和等待时间。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1013-1023. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307747. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Change in Second-Trimester Abortion After Implementation of a Restrictive State Law.限制州法律实施后,妊娠中期堕胎的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):771-779. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003183.
3
Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎后婴儿死亡。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Aug 1;178(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0885.
4
Medication abortion use among low-income and rural Texans before and during state-imposed restrictions and after FDA-updated labeling.在得克萨斯州实施限制以及美国食品药品监督管理局更新标签前后,低收入和农村得克萨斯州居民药物流产使用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):236.e1-236.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Factors associated with abortion at 12 or more weeks gestation after implementation of a restrictive Texas law.实施德克萨斯州限制堕胎法后 12 周或以上妊娠终止相关因素。
Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):314-317. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
6
Unequal Spatial Consequences of Abortion Restrictions in Texas, 2021-2023.2021-2023 年,德克萨斯州堕胎限制的不平等空间后果。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1024-1033. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307652. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
Association of Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy With the Number of Facility-Based Abortions in Texas and Surrounding States.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎与德克萨斯州及周边州医疗机构堕胎数量的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2048-2055. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20423.
8
Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy and Changes in Live Births.德克萨斯州2021年对早期妊娠堕胎的禁令及活产情况的变化。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 18;330(3):281-282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12034.
9
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic.德克萨斯州居民在冠状病毒大流行期间,行政命令暂停本州服务后,前往州外进行堕胎。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043679.
10
Seeking abortion care in Ohio and Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,俄亥俄州和得克萨斯州寻求堕胎护理。
Contraception. 2023 Feb;118:109896. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.134. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

德克萨斯州行政命令禁止在 COVID-19 期间进行堕胎后,堕胎的返回率和等待时间。

Abortion Return Rates and Wait Times Before and After Texas' Executive Order Banning Abortion During COVID-19.

机构信息

Brooke Whitfield, Gracia Sierra, Klaira Lerma, Vinita Goyal, and Kari White are with the Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin. Lauren Thaxton is with Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin. Bhavik Kumar is with Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Houston, TX. Allison Gilbert is with Southwestern Women's Surgery Center, Dallas, TX.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1013-1023. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307747. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307747
PMID:39146519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11375354/
Abstract

To assess the associations between the executive order that Texas governor Greg Abbott issued on March 22, 2020, postponing procedures deemed not immediately medically necessary, and patients' access to abortion care in Texas. We used 17 515 individual-level patient records from 13 Texas abortion facilities for matched periods in 2019 and 2020 to examine differences in return rates for abortion after completion of a state-mandated ultrasound and median wait times between ultrasound and abortion visits for those who returned. Patients were less likely to return for an abortion if they had an ultrasound while the executive order was under effect (82.8%) than in the same period in 2019 (90.4%; adjusted odds ratio = 2.06; 95% confidence interval = 1.12, 3.81). Compared with patients at or before 10.0 weeks' gestation at ultrasound, patients at more than 10 weeks' gestation had higher odds of not returning for an abortion or, if they returned, experienced greater wait times between ultrasound and abortion visits. Texas' executive order prohibiting abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted patients' access to care and disproportionately affected patients who were past 10 weeks' gestation. (. 2024;114(10):1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307747).

摘要

评估德克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特于 2020 年 3 月 22 日发布的行政命令(推迟被认为非紧急医疗程序)与德克萨斯州患者获得堕胎护理之间的关联。我们使用了来自 2019 年和 2020 年 13 家德克萨斯州堕胎设施的 17515 名患者的个人记录,以检查在完成州规定的超声检查后进行堕胎的回院率以及返回患者的超声检查和堕胎就诊之间的中位数等待时间的差异。如果在行政命令生效期间(82.8%)进行超声检查,患者进行堕胎的可能性较小(90.4%;调整后的优势比=2.06;95%置信区间=1.12,3.81)。与在超声检查时处于或早于 10.0 周妊娠的患者相比,妊娠超过 10 周的患者更有可能不返回进行堕胎,或者如果返回,他们在超声检查和堕胎就诊之间的等待时间更长。德克萨斯州在 COVID-19 大流行期间禁止堕胎的行政命令扰乱了患者的护理机会,并不成比例地影响了妊娠超过 10 周的患者。(. 2024;114(10):1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307747)。