Suppr超能文献

德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎与德克萨斯州及周边州医疗机构堕胎数量的关联。

Association of Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy With the Number of Facility-Based Abortions in Texas and Surrounding States.

机构信息

Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin.

Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2048-2055. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20423.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Texas' 2021 ban on abortion in early pregnancy may demonstrate how patterns of abortion might change following the US Supreme Court's June 2022 decision overturning Roe v Wade.

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in the number of abortions and changes in the percentage of out-of-state abortions among Texas residents performed at 12 or more weeks of gestation in the first 6 months following implementation of Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), which prohibited abortions after detection of embryonic cardiac activity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study of a sample of 50 Texas and out-of-state abortion facilities using an interrupted time series analysis to assess changes in the number of abortions, and Poisson regression to assess changes in abortions at 12 or more weeks of gestation. Data included 68 820 Texas facility-based abortions and 11 287 out-of-state abortions among Texas residents during the study period from September 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022.

EXPOSURES

Abortion care obtained after (September 2021-February 2022) vs before (September 2020-August 2021) implementation of SB 8.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were changes in the number of facility-based abortions for Texas residents, in Texas and out of state, in the month after implementation of SB 8 compared with the month before. The secondary outcome was the change in the percentage of out-of-state abortions among Texas residents obtained at 12 or more weeks of gestation during the 6-month period after the law's implementation.

RESULTS

Between September 2020 and August 2021, there were 55 018 abortions in Texas and 2547 out-of-state abortions among Texas residents. During the 6 months after SB 8, there were 13 802 abortions in Texas and 8740 out-of-state abortions among Texas residents. Compared with the month before implementation of SB 8, the number of Texas facility-based abortions significantly decreased from 5451 to 2169 (difference, -3282 [95% CI, -3171 to -3396]; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.36-0.51]) in the month after SB 8 was implemented. The number of out-of-state abortions among Texas residents significantly increased from 222 to 1332 (difference, 1110 [95% CI, 1047-1177]; IRR, 5.38 [95% CI, 4.19-6.91]). Overall, the total documented number of Texas facility-based and out-of-state abortions among Texas residents significantly decreased from 5673 to 3501 (absolute change, -2172 [95% CI, -2083 to -2265]; IRR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.79]) in the first month after SB 8 was implemented compared with the previous month. Out-of-state abortions among Texas residents obtained at 12 or more weeks of gestation increased from 17.1% (221/1291) to 31.0% (399/1289) (difference, 178 [95% CI, 153-206]) during the period between September 2021 and February 2022 (P < .001 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among a sample of abortion facilities, the 2021 Texas law banning abortion in early pregnancy (SB 8) was significantly associated with a decrease in the documented total of facility-based abortions in Texas and obtained by Texas residents in surrounding states in the first month after implementation compared with the previous month. Over the 6 months following SB 8 implementation, the percentage of out-of-state abortions among Texas residents obtained at 12 or more weeks of gestation significantly increased.

摘要

重要性

德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎的规定可能表明,在美国最高法院 2022 年 6 月推翻罗诉韦德案后,堕胎模式可能会发生变化。

目的

评估在德克萨斯州参议院法案 8 (SB 8)实施后的第 12 周或以上进行的德克萨斯州居民堕胎数量的变化,以及在该法案禁止胚胎心脏活动检测后进行的堕胎数量的百分比变化。

设计、地点和参与者:利用中断时间序列分析评估堕胎数量变化的回顾性研究,使用泊松回归评估 12 周或以上妊娠的堕胎变化。数据包括 2020 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 28 日期间研究期间来自 50 家德克萨斯州和外州堕胎机构的 68400 名基于机构的堕胎和 11287 名德克萨斯州居民的外州堕胎。

暴露

在(2021 年 9 月至 2 月)实施 SB 8 后与之前(2020 年 9 月至 8 月)获得的堕胎护理。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是在 SB 8 实施后的一个月内,与实施前一个月相比,德克萨斯州居民在德克萨斯州和外州进行的基于机构的堕胎数量的变化。次要结果是在该法律实施后的 6 个月内,德克萨斯州居民在 12 周或以上妊娠时获得的外州堕胎百分比的变化。

结果

在 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 8 月期间,德克萨斯州有 55018 例堕胎和 2547 例外州堕胎。在 SB 8 实施后的 6 个月内,德克萨斯州有 13802 例堕胎和 8740 例外州堕胎。与实施 SB 8 前一个月相比,德克萨斯州基于机构的堕胎数量从 5451 例显著减少到 2169 例(差异,-3282[95%CI,-3171 至-3396];发病率比[IRR],0.43[95%CI,0.36-0.51])。德克萨斯州居民的外州堕胎数量从 222 例显著增加到 1332 例(差异,1110[95%CI,1047 至 1177];IRR,5.38[95%CI,4.19 至 6.91])。总体而言,德克萨斯州居民的基于机构的堕胎和外州堕胎的总记录数量从 5673 例显著减少到 3501 例(绝对变化,-2172[95%CI,-2083 至-2265];IRR,0.67[95%CI,0.56-0.79])在 SB 8 实施后的第一个月与前一个月相比。在 12 周或以上妊娠时获得的德克萨斯州居民的外州堕胎数量从 17.1%(221/1291)增加到 31.0%(399/1289)(差异,178[95%CI,153-206])(P < 0.001 趋势)。

结论和相关性

在堕胎机构样本中,2021 年德克萨斯州禁止早期妊娠堕胎的法律(SB 8)与实施后的第一个月内德克萨斯州居民在该州和周边州进行的基于机构的堕胎数量以及实施后的第一个月内记录的堕胎数量显著减少相关。在 SB 8 实施后的 6 个月内,德克萨斯州居民在 12 周或以上妊娠时获得的外州堕胎的百分比显著增加。

相似文献

2
Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
3
Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy.
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Aug 1;178(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0885.
4
Change in Second-Trimester Abortion After Implementation of a Restrictive State Law.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):771-779. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003183.
5
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
Abortion Access and Medically Complex Pregnancies Before and After Texas Senate Bill 8.
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May 1;141(5):995-1003. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005153. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413847. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental Distress Among Females Following 2021 Abortion Restrictions in Texas.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259576. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9576.
4
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 Nov 28;73(7):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.
5
Collective Persistence, Care, and Advocacy Amid Repeated Attacks on Reproductive Freedom.
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1000-1002. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307810. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
Mental Health Distress and Delayed Contraception Among Older Adolescents and Young Adults.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Jul;33(7):870-878. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0549. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352109. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52109.
8
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Nov 24;72(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1.
9
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
10
Abortion Access and Medically Complex Pregnancies Before and After Texas Senate Bill 8.
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May 1;141(5):995-1003. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005153. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A Preview of the Dangerous Future of Abortion Bans - Texas Senate Bill 8.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 4;387(5):388-390. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2207423. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
2
Trends In Self-Pay Charges And Insurance Acceptance For Abortion In The United States, 2017-20.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Apr;41(4):507-515. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01528.
3
Association of Texas Senate Bill 8 With Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e221122. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1122.
4
Abortion at 12 or more weeks' gestation and travel for later abortion care among Mississippi residents.
Contraception. 2022 Apr;108:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
Menstrual irregularity as a biological limit to early pregnancy awareness.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113762118.
6
Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
Changes in Abortion in Texas Following an Executive Order Ban During the Coronavirus Pandemic.
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):691-693. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24096.
8
Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017.
Contracept X. 2020;2:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
9
Texas women's decisions and experiences regarding self-managed abortion.
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0877-0.
10
Predicted changes in abortion access and incidence in a post-Roe world.
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.139. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验