• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用短视频让临床试验新手注册:信息测试实验。

Using Short-Form Videos to Get Clinical Trial Newcomers to Sign Up: Message-Testing Experiment.

机构信息

School of Journalism and Strategic Media, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.

College of Journalism & Mass Communications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 15;26:e49600. doi: 10.2196/49600.

DOI:10.2196/49600
PMID:39146532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11362704/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruiting participants for clinical trials poses challenges. Major barriers to participation include psychological factors (eg, fear and mistrust) and logistical constraints (eg, transportation, cost, and scheduling). The strategic design of clinical trial messaging can help overcome these barriers. While strategic communication can be done through various channels (eg, recruitment advertisements), health care providers on the internet have been found to be key sources for communicating clinical trial information to US adults in the social media era.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine how communication source (ie, medical doctors and peers) and message framing of TikTok videos (ie, psychological and logistical framing) influence clinical trial-related attitudes, perceptions, and sign-up behaviors under the guidance of the integrated behavioral model.

METHODS

This study used a 2 (source: doctor vs peer) × 2 (framing: psychological vs logistical) between-participant factorial design web-based experiment targeting adults in the United States who had never participated in clinical trials (ie, newcomers). A Qualtrics panel was used to recruit and compensate the study respondents (n=561). Participants viewed short-form videos with doctors or peers, using psychological or logistical framing. The main outcome measures included perceived source credibility, self-efficacy, attitude toward clinical trial participation, behavioral intention, and sign-up behavior. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the direct and indirect effects of message factors on the outcome variables. Source (doctor=1; peer=0) and framing (psychological=1; logistical=0) were dummy-coded.

RESULTS

Doctor-featured messages led to greater perceived source credibility (β=.31, P<.001), leading to greater self-efficacy (95% CI 0.13-0.30), which in turn enhanced behavioral intention (95% CI 0.12-0.29) and clinical trial sign-up behavior (95% CI 0.02-0.04). Logistical barrier-framed messages led to greater self-efficacy (β=-.09, P=.02), resulting in higher intention to participate in clinical trials (95% CI -0.38 to -0.03) and improved sign-up behavior (95% CI -0.06 to -0.004). Logistical barrier-framed messages were also directly associated with an increased likelihood of signing up for a clinical trial (β=-.08, P=.03). The model accounted for 21% of the variance in clinical trial sign-up behavior. Attitude did not significantly affect behavioral intention in this study (β=.08, P=.14), and psychological and logistical barrier-framed messages did not significantly differ in attitudes toward clinical trial participation (β=-.04, P=.09).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings advance our understanding of how people process popular message characteristics in short-form videos and lend practical guidance for communicators. We encourage medical professionals to consider short-form video sites (eg, TikTok and Instagram Reels) as effective tools for discussing clinical trials and participation opportunities. Specifically, featuring doctors discussing efforts to reduce logistical barriers is recommended. Our measuring of actual behavior as an outcome is a rare and noteworthy contribution to this research.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a55/11362704/8a75f3d76bb6/jmir_v26i1e49600_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a55/11362704/c9e8817f218f/jmir_v26i1e49600_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a55/11362704/8a75f3d76bb6/jmir_v26i1e49600_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a55/11362704/c9e8817f218f/jmir_v26i1e49600_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a55/11362704/8a75f3d76bb6/jmir_v26i1e49600_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

招募临床试验参与者面临挑战。参与的主要障碍包括心理因素(例如,恐惧和不信任)和后勤限制(例如,交通、费用和日程安排)。临床试验信息传递的策略设计有助于克服这些障碍。虽然可以通过各种渠道(例如,招募广告)进行策略性沟通,但在社交媒体时代,互联网上的医疗保健提供者已被发现是向美国成年人传达临床试验信息的关键来源。

目的

本研究旨在检验在整合行为模型的指导下,信息源(即医生和同行)和 TikTok 视频的信息框架(即心理和后勤框架)如何影响与临床试验相关的态度、看法和注册行为。

方法

本研究采用了一项针对从未参加过临床试验的美国成年人(即新手)的 2(来源:医生与同行)×2(框架:心理与后勤)的参与者间因子设计的网络实验。使用 Qualtrics 小组招募和补偿研究受访者(n=561)。参与者观看了由医生或同行使用心理或后勤框架制作的短视频。主要的测量指标包括感知的来源可信度、自我效能感、对临床试验参与的态度、行为意向和注册行为。结构方程模型用于分析信息因素对结果变量的直接和间接影响。来源(医生=1;同行=0)和框架(心理=1;后勤=0)采用哑变量编码。

结果

医生特色的信息导致更高的感知来源可信度(β=.31,P<.001),从而导致更高的自我效能感(95%置信区间 0.13-0.30),进而增强了行为意向(95%置信区间 0.12-0.29)和临床试验注册行为(95%置信区间 0.02-0.04)。后勤障碍框架信息导致更高的自我效能感(β=-.09,P=.02),从而导致更高的临床试验参与意向(95%置信区间-0.38 至-0.03)和改善的注册行为(95%置信区间-0.06 至-0.004)。后勤障碍框架信息也与临床试验注册的可能性增加直接相关(β=-.08,P=.03)。该模型解释了临床试验注册行为 21%的变化。在这项研究中,态度并没有显著影响行为意向(β=.08,P=.14),心理和后勤障碍框架信息在临床试验参与态度方面没有显著差异(β=-.04,P=.09)。

结论

这些发现增进了我们对人们如何处理短视频中流行信息特征的理解,并为传播者提供了实际指导。我们鼓励医疗专业人员将短视频网站(如 TikTok 和 Instagram Reels)视为讨论临床试验和参与机会的有效工具。具体来说,建议医生讨论减少后勤障碍的努力。我们将实际行为作为结果进行衡量,这是对该研究的一项罕见而有意义的贡献。

相似文献

1
Using Short-Form Videos to Get Clinical Trial Newcomers to Sign Up: Message-Testing Experiment.使用短视频让临床试验新手注册:信息测试实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 15;26:e49600. doi: 10.2196/49600.
2
Knee orthoses for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome.用于治疗髌股疼痛综合征的膝关节矫形器。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 8;2015(12):CD010513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010513.pub2.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Integrating the Situational Theory of Problem Solving and Technology Acceptance Model to Predict Intention to Practice Health Protective Behavior for Influenza-Like Illness Among TikTok Users: Cross-Sectional Study.整合问题解决情境理论与技术接受模型以预测TikTok用户对流感样疾病采取健康保护行为的意愿:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 2;27:e73677. doi: 10.2196/73677.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Public knowledge and information sources for clinical trials among adults in the USA: evidence from a Health Information National Trends Survey in 2020.美国成年人对临床试验的公共知识和信息来源:来自 2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查的证据。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Sep;22(5):416-422. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0107. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
Improving rural White men's attitudes toward clinical trial messaging and participation: effects of framing, exemplars and trust.改善农村白人男性对临床试验信息传递和参与的态度:框架、范例和信任的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2022 Nov 21;37(6):476-494. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac026.
3
Overcoming Black Americans' Psychological and Cognitive Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Effects of News Framing and Exemplars.
克服非裔美国人参与临床试验的心理和认知障碍:新闻框架和范例的影响。
Health Commun. 2023 Dec;38(12):2663-2675. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2105619. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
4
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.短视频应用作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康信息来源:TikTok 视频的信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e28318. doi: 10.2196/28318.
5
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
6
Is TikTok The Next Social Media Frontier for Medicine?TikTok会成为医学领域社交媒体的下一个前沿阵地吗?
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Oct 21;5(3). doi: 10.1002/aet2.10532. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Do Messages Matter? Investigating the Combined Effects of Framing, Outcome Uncertainty, and Number Format on COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes and Intention.信息重要吗?探究框架、结果不确定性和数字格式对 COVID-19 疫苗接种态度和意愿的综合影响。
Health Commun. 2022 Jul;37(8):944-951. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1876814. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials: Overcoming Critical Barriers.提高临床试验的多样性:克服关键障碍。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019 May;44(5):148-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
The Importance of 'Likes': The Interplay of Message Framing, Source, and Social Endorsement on Credibility Perceptions of Health Information on Facebook.“点赞”的重要性:信息框架、来源和社交认可对 Facebook 上健康信息可信度认知的相互作用。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(4):399-411. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1455770. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
10
Designing Anti-Binge Drinking Prevention Messages: Message Framing vs. Evidence Type.设计反狂饮预防信息:信息框架与证据类型。
Health Commun. 2018 Dec;33(12):1494-1502. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1372046. Epub 2017 Sep 27.