Currently, CAR-T cell therapy relies on an individualized manufacturing process in which patient's own T cells are infused back into patients after being engineered and expanded ex vivo. Despite the astonishing outcomes of autologous CAR-T cell therapy, this approach is endowed with several limitations and drawbacks, such as high cost and time-consuming manufacturing process. Switching the armature of CAR-T cell therapy from autologous settings to allogeneic can overcome several bottlenecks of the current approach. Nevertheless, the use of allogeneic CAR-T cells is limited by the risk of life-threatening GvHD. Thus, in recent years, developing a method to move CAR-T cell therapy to allogeneic settings without the risk of GvHD has become a hot research topic in this field. Since the alloreactivity of αβ T-cell receptor (TCR) accounts for developing GvHD, several efforts have been made to disrupt endogenous TCR of allogeneic CAR-T cells using gene editing tools to prevent GvHD. Nonetheless, the off-target activity of gene editing tools and their associated genotoxicities, as well as the negative consequences of endogenous TCR disruption, are the main concerns of using this approach. As an alternative, CAR αβ-T cells can be replaced with other types of CAR-engineered cells that are capable of recognizing and killing malignant cells through CAR while avoiding the induction of GvHD. These alternatives include T cell subsets with restricted TCR repertoire (γδ-T, iNKT, virus-specific T, double negative T cells, and MAIT cells), killer cells (NK and CIK cells), non-lymphocytic cells (neutrophils and macrophages), stem/progenitor cells, and cell-free extracellular vesicles. In this review, we discuss how these alternatives can move CAR-based immunotherapy to allogeneic settings to overcome the bottlenecks of autologous manner without the risk of GvHD. We comprehensively discuss the pros and cons of these alternatives over the traditional CAR αβ-T cells in light of their preclinical studies and clinical trials.