Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 15;14(1):18932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68025-2.
The current research on ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has been mostly limited to Door-to-Balloon (D-to-B) time. This study aimed to compare the effects of different hospital admission modes to on the time metrics of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). It also examined the effects of these modes on in-hospital mortality and other influencing factors. The goal was to prompt healthcare facilities at all levels, including chest hospitals, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and communities to take measures to enhance the treatment outcomes for patients with STEMI. A total of 1053 cases of STEMI patients admitted to Tianjin Chest Hospital from December 2016 to December 2023 and successfully underwent PPCI were selected for this study. They were divided into three groups based on the admission modes: the ambulances group (363 cases), the self-presentation group (305 cases), and the transferred group (385 cases). Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the impact of different modes of hospital admission on the standard-reaching rate of key treatment time metrics. The results showed that the S-to-FMC time of transferred patients (OR = 0.434, 95% CI 0.316-0.596, P < 0.001) and self-presentation patients (OR = 0.489, 95% CI 0.363-0.659, P < 0.001) were more likely to exceed the standard than that of ambulance patients; The cath lab pre-activation time of self-presented patients was also less likely to meet the standard than that of ambulance patients (OR = 0.695, 95% CI 0.499-0.967, P = 0.031); D-to-W time of self-presentation patients was less likely to reach the standard than that of ambulance patients (OR = 0.323, 95% CI 0.234-0.446, P < 0.001);However, the FMC-to-ECG time of self-presentation patients was more likely to reach the standard than that of ambulance patients (OR = 2.601, 95% CI 1.326-5.100, P = 0.005). The Cox proportional hazards model analysis revealed that for ambulance patients, the time spent at each key treatment time point is shorter, leading to lower in-hospital mortality rate (HR0.512, 95% CI 0.302-0.868, P = 0.013) compared to patients admitted by other means. We found that direct arrival of STEMI patients to the PCI hospital via ambulance at the onset of the disease significantly reduces the S-to-FMC time, FMC-to-ECG time, D-to-W time, and catheterization room activation time compared to patients who self-present. This admission mode enhances the likelihood of meeting the benchmark standards for each time metric, consequently enhancing patient outcomes.
本研究旨在比较不同入院模式对行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者时间指标的影响,并探讨这些模式对住院死亡率和其他影响因素的影响。目的是促使各级医疗机构,包括胸科医院、疾病预防控制中心(CDC)和社区采取措施,提高 STEMI 患者的治疗效果。
选择 2016 年 12 月至 2023 年 12 月在天津市胸科医院成功行 PPCI 的 1053 例 STEMI 患者,根据入院模式分为三组:救护车组(363 例)、自行就诊组(305 例)和转院组(385 例)。采用多变量 logistic 回归探讨不同入院模式对关键治疗时间指标达标率的影响。结果显示,与救护车组相比,转院组(OR=0.434,95%CI 0.316-0.596,P<0.001)和自行就诊组(OR=0.489,95%CI 0.363-0.659,P<0.001)的 S-to-FMC 时间更有可能超过标准;自行就诊组的导管室激活时间也更不可能达到标准(OR=0.695,95%CI 0.499-0.967,P=0.031);与救护车组相比,自行就诊组的 D-to-W 时间更不可能达到标准(OR=0.323,95%CI 0.234-0.446,P<0.001);然而,自行就诊组的 FMC-to-ECG 时间更有可能达到标准(OR=2.601,95%CI 1.326-5.100,P=0.005)。Cox 比例风险模型分析显示,与其他入院方式相比,救护车组的每个关键治疗时间点的时间更短,导致住院死亡率更低(HR0.512,95%CI 0.302-0.868,P=0.013)。
我们发现,与自行就诊的患者相比,STEMI 患者在发病时通过救护车直接到达 PCI 医院,可显著缩短 S-to-FMC 时间、FMC-to-ECG 时间、D-to-W 时间和导管室激活时间,这种入院模式提高了每个时间指标的达标率,从而改善了患者的预后。