• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Establishing a common ground: the future of triage systems.建立共识：分诊系统的未来。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 15;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01070-2.
2
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的初级保健专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub3.
3
EDT-MCFEF: a multi-channel feature fusion model for emergency department triage of medical texts.EDT-MCFEF：一种用于医学文本急诊科分诊的多通道特征融合模型。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;13:1591491. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591491. eCollection 2025.
4
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.在医院急诊科提供非紧急护理的基层医疗专业人员。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2(2):CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub4.
5
A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments.系统评价分诊相关干预措施以改善急诊科患者流程
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jul 19;19:43. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-43.
6
Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care.系统评价和验证预测规则，以识别急诊科和紧急初级保健中严重感染的儿童。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta16150.
7
Ethical Guidance for Disaster Response, Specifically Around Crisis Standards of Care: A Systematic Review.灾害应对的伦理指导，特别是围绕危机护理标准：一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303882. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Strategies to improve the quality of nurse triage in emergency departments: A systematic review.提高急诊科护士分诊质量的策略：一项系统综述
Int Emerg Nurs. 2025 Aug;81:101639. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101639. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
9
Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.急诊分诊量表及其构成要素：系统评价科学证据。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 30;19:42. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-42.
10
Exploring prehospital emergency care challenges and interventions to reduce emergency department overcrowding: a qualitative meta-synthesis.探索院前急救挑战及减少急诊科过度拥挤的干预措施：一项定性元综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e097457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097457.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the National Early Warning Score and the Manchester Triage System in Emergency Department Triage: A Multi-Outcome Performance Evaluation.比较国家早期预警评分与曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊科分诊中的应用：多结果绩效评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;15(9):1055. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091055.
2
Assessing triage efficiency in Italy: a comparative study using simulated cases among nurses: reply.评估意大利的分诊效率：一项在护士中使用模拟病例的比较研究：回复
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;20(2):541-542. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03906-6. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
3
Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.利用机器学习和自然语言处理提高急诊科分诊性能的系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01135-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing triage accuracy: The influence of nursing education on risk prediction.提高分诊准确率：护理教育对风险预测的影响。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Aug;75:101486. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101486. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Triage Accuracy of Emergency Nurses: An Evidence-Based Review.急诊护士的分诊准确性：一项循证综述
J Emerg Nurs. 2024 Jan;50(1):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
3
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
4
Using the HEART score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department of Kosovo as an important triage criterion for treatment and hospitalization.在科索沃急诊科胸痛患者中使用HEART评分作为治疗和住院的重要分诊标准。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jun 8;85(7):3318-3322. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000940. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills retention among healthcare providers: A scoping review.医疗保健提供者心肺复苏技能保留的因素：范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103617. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103617. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
6
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index in US Emergency Departments for the Rate of Mistriage.评估美国急诊部的紧急严重程度指数在分诊错误率方面的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233404. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3404.
7
Daily triage audit can improve nurses' triage stratification: A pre-post study.每日分诊审核可提高护士分诊分层能力：一项前后对照研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Feb;79(2):605-615. doi: 10.1111/jan.15521. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
Improving triage accuracy through a modified nurse-administered emergency department assessment of chest pain score on patients with chest pain at triage (EDACT): A prospective observational study.通过改良护士实施的胸痛分诊急诊科评估（EDACT）评分提高胸痛患者分诊准确性：一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2022 Mar;61:101130. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101130. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
9
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动：2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
10
Validity of the Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale in mainland China: a retrospective observational study.中国大陆地区台湾急诊与重症分类评分的有效性：回顾性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Aug;39(8):617-622. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208732. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

建立共识：分诊系统的未来。

Establishing a common ground: the future of triage systems.

机构信息

Innovation, Research and Teaching Service (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 15;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01070-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-024-01070-2
PMID:39148042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11328465/
Abstract

Triage systems, crucial for Emergency Departments, face unresolved doubts and issues that have not been addressed, coupled with increasing fragmentation due to a growing body of new evidence. International collaboration is essential for evidence-based triage solutions.

摘要

分诊系统对于急诊科至关重要，但仍存在悬而未决的疑虑和未解决的问题，加之新证据不断增加，导致分诊工作愈发碎片化。基于证据的分诊解决方案需要国际间的协作。