University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Savonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio, Finland.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 15;24(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05864-7.
In the digital era, developing effective teaching methods is crucial due to the challenges of maintaining students' concentration amidst distractions. This study assessed the effects of learning-promoting factors both across group boundaries and within RCT learning groups examined in our previous study on the effectiveness of online versus live teaching.
The participants' experiences in the domains of Concentration, Anticipation, Liking and Desire to reuse were evaluated online immediately after a lesson on diagnosing pediatric respiratory issues implemented either in a Live, Live-stream, Vodcast or Podcast setting. The students rated their experiences on a scale of 1-10 with scores above a median of 8 indicating high experience levels in each factor. Learning was evaluated using a Webropol e-Test immediately and five weeks after the teaching session. The 15-minute test, comprised of 10 multiple-choice questions and real-life video scenarios, measured both theoretical and diagnostic skills. The test score scale ranged from - 26 to 28 points.
High concentration was experienced by 70/72 (97.2%) students in the Live, 41/75 (54.7%) students in the Live-stream, 53/72 (73.6%) students in the Vodcast and 36/79 (45.6%) students in the Podcast teaching groups (P < 0.01). High concentration promoted learning the most, resulting in a 1.93 score improvement in the short-term test and a 1.65 score improvement in the long-term test. Among those with high concentration, the average test scores ranged from 21.9 to 23.4, while the range for low concentration was 18.3-20.0.
In our study, good concentration promoted higher test scores in comparison with low concentration across all the learning modalities, both in digital and live settings. However, the live teaching modality resulted in the highest levels of concentration. Our results suggest that teachers should use various teaching modalities and utilize related special features to engage learners and maintain their concentration.
在数字时代,由于在分心的情况下保持学生注意力集中的挑战,开发有效的教学方法至关重要。本研究评估了学习促进因素在我们之前关于在线与现场教学效果的研究中跨组界限和在 RCT 学习组内的效果。
在实施在线或现场教学后,立即在诊断儿科呼吸问题的课程结束后在线评估参与者在专注、期待、喜欢和渴望重复使用领域的体验。学生们在 1-10 的范围内对他们的体验进行评分,评分高于中位数 8 表示每个因素的体验水平较高。学习使用 Webropol e-Test 立即和教学课程后五周进行评估。15 分钟的测试包括 10 个多项选择题和现实生活视频场景,衡量理论和诊断技能。测试分数范围为-26 至 28 分。
70/72(97.2%)名学生在现场教学组、41/75(54.7%)名学生在现场直播教学组、53/72(73.6%)名学生在视频教学组和 36/79(45.6%)名学生在播客教学组中体验到高度专注(P<0.01)。高专注度最能促进学习,导致短期测试成绩提高 1.93 分,长期测试成绩提高 1.65 分。在高专注度的学生中,平均测试成绩在 21.9 到 23.4 之间,而低专注度的学生成绩在 18.3 到 20.0 之间。
在我们的研究中,与低专注度相比,所有学习模式,无论是数字模式还是现场模式,良好的专注度都能提高测试成绩。然而,现场教学模式能产生最高水平的专注度。我们的结果表明,教师应该使用各种教学模式,并利用相关的特殊功能来吸引学习者并保持他们的注意力。