Lien Kelly, Chin Alvin, Helman Anton, Chan Teresa M
Michael G. Degroote School of Medicine, McMaster University.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University.
Cureus. 2018 Jan 15;10(1):e2065. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2065.
Introduction Podcasts and blog posts have gained popularity in Free Open Access Medical education (FOAM). Previous work suggests that podcasts may be useful for knowledge acquisition in undergraduate medical education. However, there remains a paucity of research comparing the two mediums. This study aims to investigate if there are differences in knowledge acquisition and usage conditions by medical students using podcasts and blog posts. Methods Medical students were randomized to either the podcast or blog post group. They completed an initial online assessment of their baseline knowledge on the subject matter. Participants then received access to learning materials and were given four weeks to complete the follow-up assessment on their own time. Independent t-test, paired samples t-test, and a mixed ANOVA (analysis of variance) were conducted to assess knowledge acquisition. An intention-to-teach analysis was used to impute missing data from students lost to follow-up. Simple descriptive statistical data was used to describe media usage conditions. Results Completion of at least one follow-up assessment was comparable (68% podcasts (n = 21/31), 73% blog posts (n = 22/30)). Both groups showed significant improvements in their test scores, with an average 22% improvement for the podcast group and 29% for the blog post group. There was no significant statistical difference in knowledge acquisition between educational modalities overall. Students in the blog post group that completed both post-intervention quizzes showed a larger improvement than the podcast group in the toxicology topic, with similar improvements in the asthma topic. The podcast group tended to engage in multiple activities while using the learning materials (e.g. at least two to three of the following: driving, eating, chores, taking notes, exercising/walking), while the blog readers tended to do fewer activities (e.g. only one of the following: note taking, eating). Conclusion This study suggests that podcasts and blog posts are useful for extracurricular knowledge acquisition by undergraduate medical students with no significant difference between the two modalities. The usage conditions for each type of media differ.
引言 播客和博客文章在免费开放获取医学教育(FOAM)中越来越受欢迎。先前的研究表明,播客可能有助于本科医学教育中的知识获取。然而,比较这两种媒介的研究仍然很少。本研究旨在调查医学生使用播客和博客文章在知识获取和使用条件方面是否存在差异。方法 将医学生随机分为播客组或博客文章组。他们完成了对其关于该主题的基线知识的初始在线评估。参与者随后获得学习材料,并被给予四周时间在自己的时间完成后续评估。进行独立样本t检验、配对样本t检验和混合方差分析以评估知识获取情况。采用意向性教学分析来推算失访学生的缺失数据。使用简单的描述性统计数据来描述媒介使用条件。结果 至少完成一次后续评估的情况相当(播客组为68%(n = 21/31),博客文章组为73%(n = 22/30))。两组的测试成绩均有显著提高,播客组平均提高22%,博客文章组平均提高29%。总体而言,两种教育方式在知识获取方面没有显著的统计学差异。完成干预后两次测验的博客文章组学生在毒理学主题上的进步比播客组更大,在哮喘主题上的进步相似。播客组在使用学习材料时倾向于同时进行多项活动(例如,以下至少两到三项:开车、吃饭、做家务、做笔记、锻炼/散步),而博客读者倾向于进行的活动较少(例如,以下仅一项:做笔记、吃饭)。结论 本研究表明,播客和博客文章对本科医学生的课外知识获取有用,两种方式之间没有显著差异。每种媒介的使用条件不同。